2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-018-0037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Foraging Theory and Medicinal Bark Extraction in Northeastern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though several studies demonstrate that PES harvesting behaviour is influenced by different SEDs, such as (i) availability (Hora et al 2021), (ii) socio-economic factors, (iii) culture (Hora et al 2021), and (iv) species-level (Leaver and Cherry 2020), this study also found that the influence of a given socio-ecological factor was not consistent across the different distance regimes from the forest resources. Our finding implies that distance regimes may highly influence human behaviour in forest resource harvesting consistent with the Optimal Foraging Theory (Soldati et al 2017;Feitosa et al 2018). Our finding is consistent with Mohammed and Inoue (2017) who reported that as the distance from communities to the forest resources increases, there is less likelihood that communities will harvest the PESs at far distance depending on the prevalent socio-ecological factors that differ from one community to other.…”
Section: Provisioning Ecosystem Services and The Harvesting Distancesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though several studies demonstrate that PES harvesting behaviour is influenced by different SEDs, such as (i) availability (Hora et al 2021), (ii) socio-economic factors, (iii) culture (Hora et al 2021), and (iv) species-level (Leaver and Cherry 2020), this study also found that the influence of a given socio-ecological factor was not consistent across the different distance regimes from the forest resources. Our finding implies that distance regimes may highly influence human behaviour in forest resource harvesting consistent with the Optimal Foraging Theory (Soldati et al 2017;Feitosa et al 2018). Our finding is consistent with Mohammed and Inoue (2017) who reported that as the distance from communities to the forest resources increases, there is less likelihood that communities will harvest the PESs at far distance depending on the prevalent socio-ecological factors that differ from one community to other.…”
Section: Provisioning Ecosystem Services and The Harvesting Distancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, many studies have applied the Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) to disentangle the contribution of different socioecological determinants on user behaviour. The OFT suggests that human beings will maximise their gains, whether economic or energy demanding, when extracting PESs (Soldati et al 2017;Feitosa et al 2018). The theory is applied to understand the fundamental choices of foragers, such as where to forage, what to forage, and how long to spend foraging (Kefa et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite criticisms by some anthropologist that OFT is reductionistic and cannot account for the historical and socio-cultural factors that structure human societies (e.g., Ferguson 2016; Jones 2009; Meehan 1983; Soares Feitosa et al 2018), foraging models may be more relevant to human foragers than to other organisms precisely because of the human ability to process vast amounts of information about the environment, guiding people towards the optimal choice, thereby maximizing fitness (Smith 1983). Foraging models attempt to predict the optimum state under specified environmental conditions, which are then tested against behavior exhibited by particular organisms to determine the fit between observation and prediction (Kormondy and Brown 1998: 416).…”
Section: Human Behavioral Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%