2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-014-0532-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Feedback Control for Linear Systems with Input Delays Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to feedback controllers (i.e., PD and proportional-integral-derivative), which are not optimal in the presence of delays, optimal controllers can model the control of human standing ( Kiemel et al, 2002 ; Kuo, 1995 ; Kuo, 2005 ; van der Kooij et al, 1999 ; van der Kooij et al, 2001 ) and theoretically stabilize human standing with large (>500 ms) delays ( Kuo, 1995 ). This ability, however, rapidly declines with increasing center of mass accelerations ( Kuo, 1995 ), including those driven by external disturbances ( Zhou and Wang, 2014 ). Although feedback and optimal controllers assume that the nervous system linearly and continuously modulates the balancing torques to stand ( Fitzpatrick et al, 1996 ; Masani et al, 2006 ; van der Kooij and de Vlugt, 2007 ; Vette et al, 2007 ), intermittent corrective balance actions ( Asai et al, 2009 ; Bottaro et al, 2005 ; Gawthrop et al, 2011 ; Loram et al, 2011 ; Loram et al, 2005 ) may represent a solution when time delays rule out continuous control ( Gawthrop and Wang, 2006 ; Arsan et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to feedback controllers (i.e., PD and proportional-integral-derivative), which are not optimal in the presence of delays, optimal controllers can model the control of human standing ( Kiemel et al, 2002 ; Kuo, 1995 ; Kuo, 2005 ; van der Kooij et al, 1999 ; van der Kooij et al, 2001 ) and theoretically stabilize human standing with large (>500 ms) delays ( Kuo, 1995 ). This ability, however, rapidly declines with increasing center of mass accelerations ( Kuo, 1995 ), including those driven by external disturbances ( Zhou and Wang, 2014 ). Although feedback and optimal controllers assume that the nervous system linearly and continuously modulates the balancing torques to stand ( Fitzpatrick et al, 1996 ; Masani et al, 2006 ; van der Kooij and de Vlugt, 2007 ; Vette et al, 2007 ), intermittent corrective balance actions ( Asai et al, 2009 ; Bottaro et al, 2005 ; Gawthrop et al, 2011 ; Loram et al, 2011 ; Loram et al, 2005 ) may represent a solution when time delays rule out continuous control ( Gawthrop and Wang, 2006 ; Arsan et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractional optimal control of a system having a performance index with delayed terms. Some texts study the optimal control problem consists of a quadratic performance index with delayed terms, for example see [32,43]. Assume that for all types of the given systems, we have…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (24), the current control input Δ ( ) uses the future state vector ( + ). It is necessary to predict the future state vector to ensure that the controller is executable.…”
Section: Theorem 1 If (A1) and (A2) Hold Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting (26) into (24), the feedback control law of the augmented error system (11) can be obtained as follows:…”
Section: Theorem 1 If (A1) and (A2) Hold Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation