1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5912-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
367
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 642 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
367
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem was extensively discussed (see for instance, Atkinson and Donev (1992), Fedorov (1972), Pazman (1986), Pukelsheim (1994) and Silvey (1980)), and it is difficult to add anything new in this area of experimental design theory. Theorem 1 which follows, is a generalized version of the Kiefer-Wolfowitz equivalence theorem, (see Kiefer (1959)) and stated here for the reader's convenience.…”
Section: Standard Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem was extensively discussed (see for instance, Atkinson and Donev (1992), Fedorov (1972), Pazman (1986), Pukelsheim (1994) and Silvey (1980)), and it is difficult to add anything new in this area of experimental design theory. Theorem 1 which follows, is a generalized version of the Kiefer-Wolfowitz equivalence theorem, (see Kiefer (1959)) and stated here for the reader's convenience.…”
Section: Standard Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a sequence ,Os defines a variety of the algorithms; specific examples are given by Atkinson and Donev (1992), Cook and Nachtsheim (1989), Fedorov (1972Fedorov ( , 1975 and Silvey (1980). The following sequences are most popular:…”
Section: Xexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Stigler (1971) and Studden (1982), who considered polynomial regression models, a reasonable approach to find optimal discrimination designs for this problem, is to use designs that are in some sense optimal for estimating the 2(k − s) parameters from the k − s highest terms in (1), to check if fitting these terms is actually necessary. An appropriate choice of optimality criterion is therefore the D 2(k−s) -criterion; see, e.g., Silvey (1980), i.e. we maximize the determinant of the matrix…”
Section: Optimality Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k − s, in the information matrix M k . From (5) it follows that the optimality criterion Φ(ξ, θ) belongs to the class of D A -optimality criteria; see, e.g., Silvey (1980), and is thus in some sense related to the D 2(k−s) -criterion for discriminating between η k and η s defined above. The Φ-optimal design is in this sense the D-optimal design for estimating the subset {a s+1 , .…”
Section: The Power Of This Test Can Thus Be Increased By Increasing Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-linear models the Fisher information matrix of the maximum likelihood estimator depends on the unknown parameters and for this reason optimal designs, which maximize some function of the Fisher information matrix are difficult to implement in practice. Many authors concentrate on local optimal designs, where it is assumed that a preliminary guess for the unknown parameters is available [see Chernoff (1953) or Silvey (1980)]. Most local optimal designs for non-linear regression models have been criticized for two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%