1996
DOI: 10.2172/231193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of spatial experiments: Model fitting and prediction

Abstract: This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, Fedorov (1996) was the first to do this. He made use of the so-called Karhunen-Loeve approximation to the error process.…”
Section: Bayesian Spatial Linear Model and Classical Experimental Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, Fedorov (1996) was the first to do this. He made use of the so-called Karhunen-Loeve approximation to the error process.…”
Section: Bayesian Spatial Linear Model and Classical Experimental Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ȽM ¼ Àlog det M), where the classical sensitivity function is just the ratio of the prediction variance with the estimated parameter to the prediction variance with the true parameter (cf. Fedorov, 1996). The sensitivity function to be used in an exchange type algorithm can be written as …”
Section: A Heuristic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we do not introduce a distance between two points xi and xi' (c.f. Fedorov (1996)). The concept of a distance is much less natural in communication network measurements than in meteorology or seismology, where the physical distance 11 xi -xi' 11 between observing stations may define the behavior of elements K(xi,xir) of the matrix K as functions of 11 xi -xit 11.…”
Section: Model and Optimality Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%