2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-8176-8086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
354
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
354
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These relations are referred to as sensitivity relations. For Lipschitz data similar results hold true with superdifferentials replaced by generalized gradients, see [11,24] and also [23] for an extension of the second sensitivity relation to unconstrained differential inclusions. Further results for differential inclusions under general state constraints can be found in [8,9].…”
Section: (T) ∈ F (T X(t))supporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These relations are referred to as sensitivity relations. For Lipschitz data similar results hold true with superdifferentials replaced by generalized gradients, see [11,24] and also [23] for an extension of the second sensitivity relation to unconstrained differential inclusions. Further results for differential inclusions under general state constraints can be found in [8,9].…”
Section: (T) ∈ F (T X(t))supporting
confidence: 54%
“…In particular, first order necessary conditions for optimality were derived in the form of a maximum principle in [12,19]. We refer to [23] and the bibliography contained therein for further results and comments on maximum principles for nonsmooth control systems and differential inclusions under state constraints. Another related topic under investigation since eighties concerns Hamilton-Jacobi equations under state constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since f (x, U ) is convex for all x, from the classical Convergence Theorem (see, e.g., [3, Theorem 1, p. 60]) it follows that z(t) ∈ f (x(t), U ) for a.e. t. It then follows from from Filippov's Selection Theorem (see, e.g., [25,Th. 2.3.13]) that there existsū(·) such that z(t) = f (x(t),ū(t)).…”
Section: Results On the Sweeping Process And Its Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since N ((w,z); A 0 ) = N (w,z); gph H and N ((w,z); A 1 ) = {0} × N (z; Ω), the equality (18) follows from (20). ✷ Theorem 2 Suppose that Φ has closed range and ker T * ⊂ ker M * .…”
Section: Theorem 1 (See [2 Theorem 42])mentioning
confidence: 99%