2016
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Conservatism with Earnings Manipulation

Abstract: This paper examines the role of conservatism when an agent can manipulate upcoming earnings before all uncertainty is resolved. An increase in conservatism, by reducing the likelihood of favorable earnings, requires steeper performance pay to maintain the same level of incentives, which in turn increases the equilibrium earnings manipulation. Trade-offs between inducing effort and curbing manipulation predict an interior level of conservatism as optimal. The optimal level of conservatism is positively associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laux and Laux [2009] study management compensation by the board of directors, which also decides on oversight effort, and show that these two decisions are related. Bertomeu, Darrough, and Xue [2017] consider production and earnings management choices and focus on the optimal bias (conservatism) of the underlying accounting system. Chan [2018] studies the effect of increasing internal controls on earnings management and auditing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laux and Laux [2009] study management compensation by the board of directors, which also decides on oversight effort, and show that these two decisions are related. Bertomeu, Darrough, and Xue [2017] consider production and earnings management choices and focus on the optimal bias (conservatism) of the underlying accounting system. Chan [2018] studies the effect of increasing internal controls on earnings management and auditing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative treatment of the effect of reporting asymmetry on the cost of capital is given in Suijs (2008). Other studies such as Gigler et al (2009), Goex and Wagenhofer (2009), Caskey and Laux (2013), or Bertomeu et al (2013) provide a rationale for asymmetry based on stewardship concerns. seller by C σ 2 u À Á where C(.)…”
Section: Value Of Information Under Pure-exchange and An Application mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results when K < 1 mirror those for K > 1 and will be mentioned in footnotes wherever relevant. Hemmer, and Zhang [2007], Bertomeu, Darrough, and Xue [2014], and Li [2013], the bias in accounting information, denoted by δ, is modeled as in the following probability structure: 9…”
Section: The Information Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonexhaustive list of exceptions includesGigler and Hemmer [2001],Kwon, Newman, and Suh [2001],Chen, Hemmer, and Zhang [2007],Gigler et al [2009], Bertomeu, Darrough, andXue [2014],Li [2013], andGao [2013].5 Assuming risk aversion would not qualitatively change the results.6 In the binary case, subscript h refers to favorable realization of any signal while subscript l refers to unfavorable realization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%