2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2009.5152761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal camera placement for total coverage

Abstract: In this document, we study the problem of optimally placing a mixture of directional and omnidirectional cameras. In our solution, the workspace is represented by an occupancy grid map [1]. Then, using surface-projected workspace and camera perception models, we develop a binary integer programming algorithm. The results of the algorithm are applied successfully to a variety of simulated scenarios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational cost of solving this LBP is reduced by a divideand-conquer strategy using the Parisian evolutionary computation approach of Dunn et al [DOL06]. This LBP can be extended to allow for different types of cameras (directional and omnidirectional) with different imaging models [GB09]. Limited Budget Placement: Another placement objective that is optimized is the coverage/visibility of an ROI under a strict limitation on the number of cameras (or equivalently a limited budget).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational cost of solving this LBP is reduced by a divideand-conquer strategy using the Parisian evolutionary computation approach of Dunn et al [DOL06]. This LBP can be extended to allow for different types of cameras (directional and omnidirectional) with different imaging models [GB09]. Limited Budget Placement: Another placement objective that is optimized is the coverage/visibility of an ROI under a strict limitation on the number of cameras (or equivalently a limited budget).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FoV overlapping indicates that two or more visual sensors are related and such relation can be exploited in different ways, as in node localization [15] and when composing communication topologies [16]. In some cases, however, FoV overlapping may be viewed as a suboptimal configuration that should be avoided [17] [18], especially in controlled environments where unconstrained nodes are deployed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 provides the main categories of approximation methods tested in this paper and their usage in existing works. BIP/LP Greedy Heuristic MC SDP [15] X [3] X [8] X X [14] X X [28] X X [13] X [27] X X [7] X X X Table 1. Various approaches for camera placement…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy naturally leads to combinatorial problems with the camera, environment, and traffic models encoded in different integral constraints and objective functions. Efforts have been made to formulate the discrete camera placement problems using standard binary linear programming [15,28,13] and quadratic programming [7]. While both formulations result in NP-hard problems, a myriad of practical solutions including Binary Integer Programming solvers (BIP), greedy approach, greedy heuristics, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and Semi-Definite Programming relaxations (SDP) have been proposed [15,3,8,14,28,13,27,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%