Abstract:This paper is concerned with feedback vibration control of a lightly damped flexible structure that has a large number of well-separated modes. A single active electrical dynamic absorber is used to reduce a particular single vibration mode selectively or multiple modes simultaneously. The absorber is realized electrically by feeding back the structural acceleration at one position to a collocated piezoceramic patch actuator via a controller consisting of one or several second order lowpass filters. A simple a… Show more
“…Actuators 2016, 5, 27 25 of 28 the MR-SVA with 80% of mass is also computed for 50% of the worst-case excitation 3 w…”
Section: Mr-sva With Reduced Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the concept of the undamped dynamic vibration absorber is highly preferable for controlled mass dampers if the task is to maximally reduce harmonic vibrations with time-varying frequencies. Such controlled vibration absorbers may be based on electrical actuators, shape memory alloys, electrorheological dampers, MR elastomers and MR dampers that allow adjusting in real-time the controllable frequency of the absorber to the actual frequency of vibration [8,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuators 2016, 5,27 13 of 28clipping and the residual force(Figure 6c-f). Due to the stiffness correction method (Equation(14)) des c .…”
This paper describes a semi-active vibration absorber (SVA) concept based on a real-time controlled magnetorheological damper (MR-SVA) for the enhanced mitigation of structural vibrations due to harmonic disturbing forces. The force of the MR damper is controlled in real-time to generate the frequency and damping controls according to the behaviour of the undamped vibration absorber for the actual frequency of vibration. As stiffness and damping emulations in semi-active actuators are coupled quantities the control is formulated to prioritize the frequency control by the controlled stiffness. The control algorithm is augmented by a stiffness correction method ensuring precise frequency control when the desired control force is constrained by the semi-active restriction and residual force of the MR damper. The force tracking task is solved by a model-based feed forward with feedback correction. The MR-SVA is numerically and experimentally validated for the primary structure with nominal eigenfrequency and when de-tuning of −10%, −5%, +5% and +10% is present. Both validations demonstrate that the MR-SVA improves the vibration reduction in the primary structure by up to 55% compared to the passive tuned mass damper (TMD). Furthermore, it is shown that the MR-SVA with only 80% of tuned mass leads to approximately the same enhanced performance while the associated increased relative motion amplitude of the tuned mass is more than compensated be the reduced dimensions of the mass. Therefore, the MR-SVA is an appropriate solution for the mitigation of tall buildings where the pendulum mass can be up to several thousands of metric tonnes and space for the pendulum damper is limited.
“…Actuators 2016, 5, 27 25 of 28 the MR-SVA with 80% of mass is also computed for 50% of the worst-case excitation 3 w…”
Section: Mr-sva With Reduced Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the concept of the undamped dynamic vibration absorber is highly preferable for controlled mass dampers if the task is to maximally reduce harmonic vibrations with time-varying frequencies. Such controlled vibration absorbers may be based on electrical actuators, shape memory alloys, electrorheological dampers, MR elastomers and MR dampers that allow adjusting in real-time the controllable frequency of the absorber to the actual frequency of vibration [8,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuators 2016, 5,27 13 of 28clipping and the residual force(Figure 6c-f). Due to the stiffness correction method (Equation(14)) des c .…”
This paper describes a semi-active vibration absorber (SVA) concept based on a real-time controlled magnetorheological damper (MR-SVA) for the enhanced mitigation of structural vibrations due to harmonic disturbing forces. The force of the MR damper is controlled in real-time to generate the frequency and damping controls according to the behaviour of the undamped vibration absorber for the actual frequency of vibration. As stiffness and damping emulations in semi-active actuators are coupled quantities the control is formulated to prioritize the frequency control by the controlled stiffness. The control algorithm is augmented by a stiffness correction method ensuring precise frequency control when the desired control force is constrained by the semi-active restriction and residual force of the MR damper. The force tracking task is solved by a model-based feed forward with feedback correction. The MR-SVA is numerically and experimentally validated for the primary structure with nominal eigenfrequency and when de-tuning of −10%, −5%, +5% and +10% is present. Both validations demonstrate that the MR-SVA improves the vibration reduction in the primary structure by up to 55% compared to the passive tuned mass damper (TMD). Furthermore, it is shown that the MR-SVA with only 80% of tuned mass leads to approximately the same enhanced performance while the associated increased relative motion amplitude of the tuned mass is more than compensated be the reduced dimensions of the mass. Therefore, the MR-SVA is an appropriate solution for the mitigation of tall buildings where the pendulum mass can be up to several thousands of metric tonnes and space for the pendulum damper is limited.
“…Vibration absorbers including passive and active dynamic vibration absorbers received increasing attention in structural vibration control in the past several years [1][2][3][4][5]. The mechanism of a passive vibration absorber is to distribute the vibration energy through coupling a slave structure to the master one [6], while an active vibration absorber produces forces to counteract the vibration through adjusting the slave structure according to the motion state of the master [7].…”
The nonlinear effect incurred by time delay in vibration control is investigated in this study via a vibration absorber coupled with a continuous beam structure. The stability of the vibration absorber coupled structure system with time-delay coupling is firstly studied, which provides a general guideline for the potential time delay to be introduced to the system. Then it is shown that there is a specific region for the time delay which can bring bifurcation modes to the dynamic response of the coupling system, and the vibration energy at low frequencies can be transferred or absorbed due to the bifurcation mode and the vibration in the corresponding frequency range is thus suppressed. The nonlinear mechanism of this vibration suppression incurred by the coupling time delay is discussed in detail, which provides a novel and alternative approach to the analysis, design, and control of vibration absorbers in engineering practice.
“…In the first case, the control strategy is responsible for filtering the sensor(s) output(s) via software and calculating the actuator(s) input(s) so that specific modes or frequency-ranges are targeted. However, this could easily lead to quite cumbersome signal processing requirements [3][4][5].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.