1952
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1952.01700030820012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optics and Visual Physiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 197 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surprising fact, reported by a variety of researchers including J.M. and others (Ogle, 1951;Graham, 1965;Borish, 1970;Rea, Ouellette and Tiller, 1990; Nakayama and Shimizu, 1991; Saito and Hosokawa, 1991), is that pupil size has a small effect on performance. it take very sensitive psychophysical techniques to measure any differential effects on performance due to pupil size over the range of naturally occurring pupil sizes typically encountered in electrically illuminated environments (pupil diameters between 2.5 and 5 mm for luminance levels between 350,000 and 0.5 cdfm2, respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The surprising fact, reported by a variety of researchers including J.M. and others (Ogle, 1951;Graham, 1965;Borish, 1970;Rea, Ouellette and Tiller, 1990; Nakayama and Shimizu, 1991; Saito and Hosokawa, 1991), is that pupil size has a small effect on performance. it take very sensitive psychophysical techniques to measure any differential effects on performance due to pupil size over the range of naturally occurring pupil sizes typically encountered in electrically illuminated environments (pupil diameters between 2.5 and 5 mm for luminance levels between 350,000 and 0.5 cdfm2, respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%