2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4941675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical tracking of nanoscale particles in microscale environments

Abstract: The trajectories of nanoscale particles through microscale environments record useful information about both the particles and the environments. Optical microscopes provide efficient access to this information through measurements of light in the far field from nanoparticles. Such measurements necessarily involve trade-offs in tracking capabilities. This article presents a measurement framework, based on information theory, that facilitates a more systematic understanding of such trade-offs to rationally desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
(229 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are encouraged to see two recent reviews introduce ways to comprehensively describe these quantities in single-molecule microscopy, including a treatment for SR imaging(234) and one for SPT. (34) Along with theoretical comparisons, it will be necessary to characterize how robust various imaging methodologies are to common aberrations, including the effect aberrations have on precision and resolution. (235, 236) Another practical concern is the performance of different localization algorithms, and it will be necessary to continue current efforts to compare existing software packages for SR(237) and SPT(238) as our theoretical understanding and frameworks develop.…”
Section: Challenges and New Developments In 3d Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are encouraged to see two recent reviews introduce ways to comprehensively describe these quantities in single-molecule microscopy, including a treatment for SR imaging(234) and one for SPT. (34) Along with theoretical comparisons, it will be necessary to characterize how robust various imaging methodologies are to common aberrations, including the effect aberrations have on precision and resolution. (235, 236) Another practical concern is the performance of different localization algorithms, and it will be necessary to continue current efforts to compare existing software packages for SR(237) and SPT(238) as our theoretical understanding and frameworks develop.…”
Section: Challenges and New Developments In 3d Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also correct errors due to rotation of the torsion frame out of the imaging plane [4]. With respect to our previous work, we trade off some spatial range for temporal resolution [12], by decreasing the readout height of our complementary metaloxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera to 128 pixels, and increasing the readout rate to 1 kHz. To maintain uncertainties at the nanometer and microradian scales, we increase both the illumination irradiance and particle diameter, boosting the mean flux of signal photons by a factor of 2.9×10 2 .…”
Section: B Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we developed a particle tracking method to resolve MEMS motion at nanometer and microradian scales. Our method is broadly applicable to diverse devices, requires only simple instrumentation, and is highly customizable within the measurement framework of optical microscopy [12]. In this Letter, we scale up the speed of our measurements by two orders of magnitude, enabling millisecond resolution and accelerating repetitive tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the number of fluorescent nanoparticles is largely independent of the design of the microsystem, being limited primarily by its surface area and in our experiment exceeding the number of etch holes by a factor of two. Importantly, this tracking method builds on the firm theoretical foundation of localizing point sources 37–40 , enabling novel evaluations of uncertainty and guiding future work. Experimental uncertainties are larger than the theoretical minimum uncertainties, which the number of detected photons and constellation size determine 37–39 , by a factor of only 1.3 to 1.6, indicating a nearly ideal measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%