1989
DOI: 10.1109/50.29628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical switch matrix with simplified N*N tree structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such interconnections can be used to provide massively parallel data communication among a few ports [15,36]. Most optical switch systems are constructed by the switch matrices with crossbar or tree structures [9,28]. For example, Okayama et al [28] developed an optical switch matrix with N_N tree structure by using 1_2, 2_1, and 2_2 switches.…”
Section: Parallel Hierarchical Clustering Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such interconnections can be used to provide massively parallel data communication among a few ports [15,36]. Most optical switch systems are constructed by the switch matrices with crossbar or tree structures [9,28]. For example, Okayama et al [28] developed an optical switch matrix with N_N tree structure by using 1_2, 2_1, and 2_2 switches.…”
Section: Parallel Hierarchical Clustering Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most optical switch systems are constructed by the switch matrices with crossbar or tree structures [9,28]. For example, Okayama et al [28] developed an optical switch matrix with N_N tree structure by using 1_2, 2_1, and 2_2 switches. Actually, the switch systems mentioned above are more complex than the one proposed in the AROB model used in this paper.…”
Section: Parallel Hierarchical Clustering Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several all optical switching technologies have already been proposed (Nishimoto et al 1990;Fujiwara et al 1991;Okayama et al 1989). Currently available devices, such as optical-micro-electromechanical system based switches (switching time: 200 ns ∼ 1 ms) (Ollier 2002), thermal-optical switches (switching time: 1-100 ms) (Tapalian et al 2002), electrooptic switches (switching time: 5-50 ns) (Krahenbuhl 2002), and acousto-optic switches (switching time: 300 ns) (Ma and Kuo 2003) are suffering from speed limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%