2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Study of p-Doping in GaAs Nanowires for Low-Threshold and High-Yield Lasing

Abstract: Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute this feature to a strong, higher-lying direct absorption in the barrier (HH → Γ) leading to high carrier densities, followed by efficient carrier transfer into the confined well states. This threshold is significantly lower than the previously reported room temperature lasing thresholds for near-infrared III-V NW lasers 20,22,41 .…”
Section: Excitation-energy-dependent Emissioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attribute this feature to a strong, higher-lying direct absorption in the barrier (HH → Γ) leading to high carrier densities, followed by efficient carrier transfer into the confined well states. This threshold is significantly lower than the previously reported room temperature lasing thresholds for near-infrared III-V NW lasers 20,22,41 .…”
Section: Excitation-energy-dependent Emissioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Excitation fluence-dependent PL characterisation was carried out on 270 isolated wires [20][21][22] , using a 620 nm sub-picosecond excitation pulse (details are provided in the Methods section). A typical measurement is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Large-scale Power-dependent μ-Pl Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, enhancing radiative efficiency instead of reducing surface recombination was demonstrated to be a suitable and convenient approach. By p‐type doping of GaAs with Zn, room‐temperature emission at ≈880 nm even in nonpassivated nanowires was enabled . Moreover, ≈900 nm lasing in nonpassivated InP nanowires was achieved by growing stacking‐fault‐free and taper‐free wires using selective‐area metal–organic vapor‐phase epitaxy .…”
Section: Spectral Tuning Of Nanowire Lasing Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we report on four of the most commonly used methods to transfer nanowires by investigating their effect on both geometry and optical performance using hundreds of single nanowire spectroscopic measurements for each method. 18,19 Using automated data acquisition techniques combined with a robust statistical analysis is essential to identify correlations that would otherwise be impossible to resolve from a smaller set of measurements. 20 Transfer methods used included a solution-based transfer by ultrasonication for 5 s and 100 s, a dry transfer by rubbing and PDMS stamping onto z-cut quartz substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Transfer methods used included a solution-based transfer by ultrasonication for 5 s and 100 s, a dry transfer by rubbing and PDMS stamping onto z-cut quartz substrates. The nanowires used for this study are a p-doped GaAs core-only architecture grown by Au-assisted vapor liquid solid mechanism as reported by Burgess et al 8,19 We compare the impact of transfer method on nanowire length, lasing yield (dened as the fraction of nanowires tested which display lasing behaviour) and lasing threshold, and correlate it with end-facet quality imaged using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). We nd that nanowires from sample transferred by 5 s ultrasound have the best lasing performance, with a median lasing threshold of 98 mJ cm À2 and a lasing yield of $72%, followed by PDMS with 104 mJ cm À2 and a reduced lasing yield of $60%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%