2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of thickness-controlled MoS2 thin films studied by spectroscopic ellipsometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photoluminescence studies also demonstrated that a reduction in thickness has a strong effect on the band structure of MoS2 and other semiconductor TMDCs, including a change in the band gap and a thickness mediated direct-toindirect band gap crossover [20][21][22][23][24]. The thickness dependent band gap can have a strong influence on other electrical [25] and optical properties, such as the absorption [25][26][27], and it has been also exploited to fabricate photodetectors where their spectral bandwidth is determined by the number of layers of the semiconductor channel [9,11]. However, the determination of the intrinsic quantum efficiency and the photoresponse of photodetectors based on semiconducting TMDCs, requires a comprehensive study of their reflectance and/or transmittance with different numbers of layers in a wide spectral range, which is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Photoluminescence studies also demonstrated that a reduction in thickness has a strong effect on the band structure of MoS2 and other semiconductor TMDCs, including a change in the band gap and a thickness mediated direct-toindirect band gap crossover [20][21][22][23][24]. The thickness dependent band gap can have a strong influence on other electrical [25] and optical properties, such as the absorption [25][26][27], and it has been also exploited to fabricate photodetectors where their spectral bandwidth is determined by the number of layers of the semiconductor channel [9,11]. However, the determination of the intrinsic quantum efficiency and the photoresponse of photodetectors based on semiconducting TMDCs, requires a comprehensive study of their reflectance and/or transmittance with different numbers of layers in a wide spectral range, which is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, these studies can hardly gain the basic optical constants, such as dielectric function, complex refraction index, etc., which play an important role in the quantitative design and optimization of those MoS 2 ‐based photoelectric devices . Beyond these researches, there are also some reports on the dielectric function of the 2D MoS 2 , where the techniques they used can be roughly divided into three types: ellipsometry, reflection (or absorption) spectrum method, and contrast spectrum or differential reflection (or transmission) spectrum method . By using of ellipsometry, Li et al investigated the optical properties of the monolayer and bulk MoS 2 , and identified some critical points (CPs) in their dielectric function spectra .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Figure S1b, Supporting Information, shows peaks at 161.9 and 163.1 eV, which are ascribed to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 , respectively. [ 29 ] This shows the formation of MoS 2 at the surface for the samples without and with CuO ILs. In addition, Figure S1c, Supporting Information, also demonstrates that after sulfurization Cu is present in the oxidation state of +1, whereas, XPS study of the as‐deposited CuO reveals that the oxidation state of Cu is +2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the composition at the surface of Mo/SLG samples without and with CuO ILs was characterized using XPS after peeling off the CZCTS absorber layer (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The study reveals peaks located at 229.1 and 232.2 eV attributed to Mo 3d 5/2 and Mo 3d 3/2 , [ 29 ] respectively, as shown in Figure S1a, Supporting Information. Moreover, Figure S1b, Supporting Information, shows peaks at 161.9 and 163.1 eV, which are ascribed to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%