2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of crystalline and non-crystalline iron oxide thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
46
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the calculated values of the refractive index and extinction coefficient from [18], varies in the range of 0.5 < n < 1.25 and 0.1 < k < 0.5 for crystalline -Fe 2 O 3 sprayed thin films. One notices a rather large variation from the results found in this work.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the calculated values of the refractive index and extinction coefficient from [18], varies in the range of 0.5 < n < 1.25 and 0.1 < k < 0.5 for crystalline -Fe 2 O 3 sprayed thin films. One notices a rather large variation from the results found in this work.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For thin films, sol-gel [11,12], chemical bath deposition [13], reactive evaporation [14,15] and spray pyrolysis [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The elaboration techniques and also the corresponding references given above are not exhaustive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well accepted that the band edge of ␣-Fe 2 O 3 is located in the range of ͑2.00-2.20͒ eV. [34][35][36] The transitions in this energy region include the d-d transitions, pair excitation, and less charge transfer, and the former two transitions mainly come from the narrow d bands, so the optical properties of hematite band edge cannot be accounted for intrinsic semiconductor. Han et al 37 recently reported room temperature PL of ␣-Fe 2 O 3 nanowires with a band gap of 2.14 eV, while PL spectra from capped and naked ␣-Fe 2 O 3 nanocrystals indicate band gaps in the 1.93-2.12 eV range.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot work has been reported using this method since Fujishima and Honda [1] first demonstrated the photoelectrochemical behaviour of TiO 2 photoelectrode in contact with aqueous solution. Hematite (α-Fe 2 O 3 ) on account of its ideal band gap energy of 1.9 to 2.2 eV [2][3][4], abundance, non-toxiticy and chemical stability in wide pH range remains a promising photoanode material [5][6][7]. Although hematite possess many advantages, but due to some limitations like short hole diffusion length, high carrier recombination rate and conduction band edge position [8], PEC performance of the hematite photoanode is much below its theoretical solar to chemical conversion efficiency of 12.9% [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%