2008
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Power of the Isolated Human Crystalline Lens

Abstract: The lens power decreases with age, due mainly to a decrease in the contribution of the gradient. The use of a constant equivalent refractive index value to calculate lens power with the lens maker formula will underestimate the power of young lenses and overestimate the power of older lenses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
79
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of reports of the index of refraction of the capsular bag prevented us from using that value in the calculations. Instead, and in keeping with previous publications [11,12], we used a surface refractive index of 1.3709. The refractive index of aqueous was assumed to be equal to the refractive index of water (1.332 at 635 nm).…”
Section: Lens Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lack of reports of the index of refraction of the capsular bag prevented us from using that value in the calculations. Instead, and in keeping with previous publications [11,12], we used a surface refractive index of 1.3709. The refractive index of aqueous was assumed to be equal to the refractive index of water (1.332 at 635 nm).…”
Section: Lens Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lens surface radii of curvature, and their changes with age and accommodation have been extensively measured both ex vivo, using, among other techniques, shadowphotography [11] and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) [12,13], and in vivo, using Purkinje imaging [14][15][16], Scheimpflug imaging [14,17], magnetic Resonance Imaging [18,19] and OCT [20]. Data ex vivo and in vivo differ primarily because the isolated lens appears in its maximally accommodated state, and therefore the young lens shows large steepening ex vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Figure 7 shows that this index practically does not vary with age. Possibly even this index increases progressively after 40 years, following the gradual increase in the concentration of proteins inside the lens (18) . Therefore we can consider that the solution to the riddle of accommodation and presbyopia cannot be in the crystalline.…”
Section: A New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these changes were never confirmed (5,10) . The most found in studies of literature, in relation to the aging eye, is the progressive hardening of the sclera (13,18) . This fact seems to us highly suggestive to justify a new approach in the etiology of presbyopia, by directing it to the posterior pole of the eye.…”
Section: The Presbyopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an increase in the dioptric power of the eye that enables the image of near objects to be focused on the retina. The refractive power of the lens is strongly affected by age and ranges from about 15 diopters at birth to around 2 diopters at the age of fifty (Alió, Schimchak et al 2005;Borja, Manns et al 2008). The index of refraction for a normal lens changes from 1.40 at the center to 1.36 on the periphery and is also greatly affected by age.…”
Section: The Ocular Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%