2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2009.5354337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical flow on a flapping wing robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One small improvement of the DTA may be to not reset the evidence e to 0, reducing the influence of only a few τ RL measurements. As main directions for larger improvements of the obstacle avoidance capabilities, we identify the incorporation of onboard vision processing for reducing noise and allowing the direct feedback of gyro measurements (cf [55]) or the feedback current from the motors (as in [7]) for derotating optic flow. In addition, work on shorter turn radiuses of DelFly would also be of great help in confined spaces such as small office rooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One small improvement of the DTA may be to not reset the evidence e to 0, reducing the influence of only a few τ RL measurements. As main directions for larger improvements of the obstacle avoidance capabilities, we identify the incorporation of onboard vision processing for reducing noise and allowing the direct feedback of gyro measurements (cf [55]) or the feedback current from the motors (as in [7]) for derotating optic flow. In addition, work on shorter turn radiuses of DelFly would also be of great help in confined spaces such as small office rooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second limitation is that time-to-impact estimates rely on accurate optic flow measurements. Unfortunately, images made with flapping wing MAVs are challenging (cf [7]). Currently, a small camera onboard the DelFly is used that transmits its images analogically to a ground control station.…”
Section: Autonomy Of the Delflymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, due to the limitations of micromachining methods and the shortcomings of power systems, payloads and navigation technologies, artificial MAVs cannot fly as freely as real insects. (Bermudez & Fearing, 2009; Breugel et al., 2008; Whitney & Wood, 2010). They could only imitate the flying performance of insects to a certain extent, and were far from comparable with insects in terms of flight speed, perception of external conditions, energy supply, environmental adaptability, effective flight distance, and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%