Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38253-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo Vision Based Obstacle Avoidance on Flapping Wing MAVs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In small confined spaces this is a problem as it limits the set of possible trajectories which can be safely undertaken and complicates the required obstacle avoidance strategies (cf. [5]). If an FWMAV has the ability to minimize the forward velocity or even hover, the navigation in small confined spaces would be significantly improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In small confined spaces this is a problem as it limits the set of possible trajectories which can be safely undertaken and complicates the required obstacle avoidance strategies (cf. [5]). If an FWMAV has the ability to minimize the forward velocity or even hover, the navigation in small confined spaces would be significantly improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1. This platform has a wingspan of 28 cm and a weight of 20 g. The Explorer version of the DelFly has a few important differences compared to its design used in previous studies ( [19], [32]). First, it has a cumston-made 1.0 g autopilot board which includes all electronics required for flight control: an electronic speed controller for its brushless motor, a transceiver for two-way communication with a remote station, and an ATmega328P 20 MHz microcontroller for onboard processing.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unwittingly, the bidirectional wall avoidance in a square room can result in the DelFly getting caught in and crashing into corners. There are available methods to correct for this behaviour [50,55] but as this is a conceptual error typical for human designed systems, we will keep this behaviour as is. Figure 4 shows the path of successful and failed flight realisations of DelFly with the user-defined behaviour.…”
Section: User Designed Behaviour Treementioning
confidence: 99%