2019 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF/IFC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/fcs.2019.8856091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Fiber Trans-national Time Transfer for Comparing Two UTC Realisations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing optical networks, however, are typically designed to use fiber pairs with upstream optical data traveling in one direction through one fiber and downstream data traveling through the other. In such systems, a bidirectional wavelength channel for WR can nevertheless be achieved using WDM methods as these may also include dedicated bidirectional optical amplifiers for the WR optical signals (Lopez et al, 2010); (Dierikx et al, 2016); (Dierikx et al, 2019); (Smets, 2016); (Boven et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing optical networks, however, are typically designed to use fiber pairs with upstream optical data traveling in one direction through one fiber and downstream data traveling through the other. In such systems, a bidirectional wavelength channel for WR can nevertheless be achieved using WDM methods as these may also include dedicated bidirectional optical amplifiers for the WR optical signals (Lopez et al, 2010); (Dierikx et al, 2016); (Dierikx et al, 2019); (Smets, 2016); (Boven et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WR has been shown to be compatible with optical amplifiers and the existing long-distance fiber-optic telecommunication infrastructure carrying live data traffic (Dierikx et al, 2016); (Boven et al, 2019); (Dierikx et al, 2019). A residual time offset between WR devices of 0.4 ns was demonstrated over a distance of 169 km (Boven et al, 2019).…”
Section: White Rabbitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timefrequency reference distribution, over tens of kilometers with sub-nanosecond synchronization accuracy has been demonstrated [19]. High timing accuracy, at the 100 ps level, has already been demonstrated with WR [20], [21]. A 100 ps of timing error will generate 3 cm of ranging bias which may be acceptable for a decimeter level ranging or positioning system [22].…”
Section: B Testbed Synchronization Requirements and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-frequency reference distribution, over tens of kilometers with sub-nanosecond synchronization accuracy, has been demonstrated [19]. High timing accuracy, at the 100-ps level, has already been demonstrated with WR [20], [21]. A 100 ps of timing error will generate 3 cm of ranging bias which may be acceptable for a decimeter level ranging or positioning system [22].…”
Section: B Testbed Synchronization Requirements and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%