1998
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-998-0090-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical effects during rapid thermal diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the first set of experiments are similar to the results of Ref. 15. The diffusion profile of the furnace step dominates the overall doping profile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the first set of experiments are similar to the results of Ref. 15. The diffusion profile of the furnace step dominates the overall doping profile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Motivated by our earlier published work, Noel and coworkers have published a recent article dealing with the optical effects during rapid thermal diffusion. 15 The authors of Ref. 15 suggested that the diffusion enhancement was only due to the dopant oxide densification in the presence of UV radiation during the drive-in step of a two step diffusion process and not due to the lowering of activation energy affecting the diffusion kinetics as we had demonstrated in previous publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Further, studies of the solar cell process found that the presence of ultraviolet photons did not affect the kinetics of dopant diffusion in silicon but did affect the densification of the doped-glass surface film as well as the emissivity of the silicon surface. 16 In another study of the solar cell process, phosphorus was diffused from doped glass deposited on both sides of wafers that were annealed in a lamp-RTA system equipped with excimer ultraviolet lamps in the upper side of the process chamber. 17,18 No significant differences were obtained in the dopant activation on the two sides of the wafers, from which it was concluded that ultraviolet exposure is ineffective for photothermal enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%