2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical constants of amorphous and crystalline H2O-ice in the near infrared from 1.1 to 2.6 μm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
146
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the VIS-NIR range optical constants from Warren et al (1984) pertain to ice at -7 °C, whose temperature is too high if compared to Rhea's surface at 77 K (Pitman et al, 2010). However these values match reasonably well with the ones derived by Mastrapa et al (2008) at 120 K. Optical constants in the 3.2-5.1 µm range are from Clark et al (2011b) and have been computed starting from Mastrapa's values at the same wavelengths. The temperature difference between Rhea's surface and ice for which optical constants are determined introduces a tolerable error in our calculations, because it only minimally affects the results concerning grain size and contamination.…”
Section: Optical Constantsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the VIS-NIR range optical constants from Warren et al (1984) pertain to ice at -7 °C, whose temperature is too high if compared to Rhea's surface at 77 K (Pitman et al, 2010). However these values match reasonably well with the ones derived by Mastrapa et al (2008) at 120 K. Optical constants in the 3.2-5.1 µm range are from Clark et al (2011b) and have been computed starting from Mastrapa's values at the same wavelengths. The temperature difference between Rhea's surface and ice for which optical constants are determined introduces a tolerable error in our calculations, because it only minimally affects the results concerning grain size and contamination.…”
Section: Optical Constantsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We used separately tholin from Khare et al (1993), Triton tholin (McDonald et al, 1994; optical constants from Cruikshank, personal communication), Titan tholin (McDonald et al, 1994;Khare et al, 1984; optical constants from Cruikshank, personal communication) and hydrogenated amorphous carbon (ACH2) from Zubko et al (1996). Optical constants for crystalline water ice are those derived by Warren (1984) (0.35-1.25 µm, 266.15 K), Mastrapa et al (2008) (1.25-2.5 µm, 120 K), Mastrapa et al. (2009) (2.5-3.20 µm, 120 K) and Clark et al (20110b) (3.20-5.12 µm, 120 K).…”
Section: Spectral Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimization is applied outside the telluric absorption bands, which can affect the results. Best models are based on an intimate mixture of crystalline water ice (optical constants at 50 K from Grundy & Schmitt 1998), ammoniahydrate (with only 1% of ammonia diluted in water, Brown et al 1988), amorphous carbon (Zubko et al 1996), and amorphous water ice (at low temperature, Mastrapa et al 2008). The model applied to both spectra returns very similar results for the A46, page 5 of 7 compounds abundances, with almost 85% of crystalline water ice (4 µm grain size), 8% of ammonia hydrate (35 µm), 5% of amorphous carbon (10 µm), 2% of amorphous water ice (100 µm), and an asymmetry parameter comprised between 0.86 and 0.90.…”
Section: Results For Intimate Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IR interference fringes dominate over NH 3 absorptions in this spectral zone and are affected by scattering, incoherence, and double reflections, which prevents us from using them for spectral reproduction. We took a different approach, inspired by Mastrapa et al (2008), to determine the NIR optical constants of H 2 O. We focused on the two spectral regions where NH 3 has absorption, i.e., the 6800-5900 cm −1 and 5200-4100 cm −1 intervals.…”
Section: Optical Constants Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%