2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.733958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical constants in the hard X-ray/soft gamma ray range of selected materials for multilayer reflectors

Abstract: Future Astrophysics missions operating in the hard X-ray/Soft Gamma ray range is slated to carry novel focusing telescopes based on the use of depth graded multilayer reflectors. Current design studies show that, at the foreseen focal lengths, it should be feasible to focus X-rays at energies as high as 300 keV. These designs use extrapolations of theoretical and experimentally determined optical constants from below 200 keV. In this paper we report on the first experimental determination of optical constants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will be referred to as Windt-modified. It can be seen in figure 3 that using Windt-modified gives overall a better fit to the data than Jensen et al 16 but as seen clearly from figure 3b the fit predicts a factor of 2 lower reflectivity at some angles, whereas using the theoretical optical constants the fit is as good as can be expected from this type of measurements. This indicates that the extinction coefficient in Windt-modified is likely not correct since there is good agreement between the measured refractive index and the theoretical values.…”
Section: Calculations and Optical Constantsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This will be referred to as Windt-modified. It can be seen in figure 3 that using Windt-modified gives overall a better fit to the data than Jensen et al 16 but as seen clearly from figure 3b the fit predicts a factor of 2 lower reflectivity at some angles, whereas using the theoretical optical constants the fit is as good as can be expected from this type of measurements. This indicates that the extinction coefficient in Windt-modified is likely not correct since there is good agreement between the measured refractive index and the theoretical values.…”
Section: Calculations and Optical Constantsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…However, for the extinction coefficient, k, there are clear differences. The extinction coefficient value measured by Jensen et al 16 was too high, see reference 16, and can not fit the data since they introduce too much absorption, see figure 3.…”
Section: Calculations and Optical Constantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations