1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02534102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical assessment of recovery of tissue blood supply after removal of externally applied pressure

Abstract: The authors use photoelectric plethysmography to determine the external occlusion pressure for blood vessels in human tissue in vivo. Three wavelengths are employed; 950 nm (infra-red), 640 nm (red) and 583 nm (yellow). Each probe is applied in turn to one finger of each subject. Pressure is applied, using a neonatal blood pressure cuff, to the finger via the probe. This pressure is increased linearly to 20 kPa (150 mmHg) over 15 s and then decreased linearly to zero over 15 s. The pressure at which perfusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous studies comparing PPG and LD. Even if the two measures were not equivalent, a good correlation was found between LD and PPG in different conditions such as inspiratory-induced vasoconstrictive episodes [32] or wound healing [33], but its use and reliability in critical conditions was not tested. Some studies have concluded that finger PPG signal was inappropriate due to the poor signal obtained [34] while others stated that this method could have an interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous studies comparing PPG and LD. Even if the two measures were not equivalent, a good correlation was found between LD and PPG in different conditions such as inspiratory-induced vasoconstrictive episodes [32] or wound healing [33], but its use and reliability in critical conditions was not tested. Some studies have concluded that finger PPG signal was inappropriate due to the poor signal obtained [34] while others stated that this method could have an interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this set of measurements are shown in figure 16, which represents the averaged signal intensity obtained for each cuff pressure level. It was expected that the increasing pressure applied by the cuff would reduce the capillary blood flow (Murray and Marjanovic 1997) and result in an increase of the total amount of blood in the skin and underlying tissue (Douven and Lucassen 2000). Measurements at different pressures show no noticeable dependence of the reflectance signal on the capillary blood flow/perfusion change in volume fraction in this tissue compartment.…”
Section: 'Distance Measurement' Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the mattress characteristics and the skin-support surface interface affect the accuracy of the interface pressure measurement (ALLEN et aL, 1993a;REDDY et aL, 1984 BADER, 1990;BADER and CANT, 1988;BALDWIN, 2000;FELDMAN et al, 1993;GOOSSENS et aL, 1994;LIU et al, 1999;NEWSON et al, 1981;SACHSE et al, 1998;SANADA et al, 1995;XAKELLIS et al, 1991EK et aL, 1987FELDMAN et al, 1993;FRANTZ and XAKELLIS, 1989;FRANTZ et al, 1993;HERRMAN et al, 1999;JACOBS, 1989;MAYROVITZ and SIMS, 2002;MAYROVITZ et al, 2003;MAYROVITZ et al, 1997;MEINDERS et aL, 1996;PATEL et al, 1999;SACHSE et al, 1998;SANTOS et al, 2003;SCHUBERT, 1991;SCHUBERT and FAGRELL, 1989;SCHUBERT and H~RAUD, 1994;SCHUBERT et al, 1995;XAKELLIS et al, 1991;MAYROVlTZ et aL, 1999MAYROVITZ and SMITH, 1998;MAYROVITZ et al, 1997;THORFINN et al, 2002BENNETT et aL, 1979LEE et al, 1979;MURRAY and MARJANOVIC, 1997NIITSUMA et al, 2003BOLUND and HOLSTEIN, 1976DINSDALE,...…”
Section: Interface Pressure and Shear Forcesmentioning
confidence: 96%