2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optic flow and geometric field of view in a driving simulator display

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mourat et al [20] showed that the field of view in the driving simulator has an immense influence on test subjects' estimation of speed. Other studies, [21][22][23], all came to the same result.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mourat et al [20] showed that the field of view in the driving simulator has an immense influence on test subjects' estimation of speed. Other studies, [21][22][23], all came to the same result.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may explain this by the fact that all the different sensory cues involved in the evaluation of speed are not always rendered in these systems. In driving simulators for example, the lack of car vibrations rendering or a small field of view could lead to a wrong perception of speed: speed overproductions are then observed (Mourant et al, 2007). Unfortunately in this case, driver's behavior can be affected in tasks like cornering or emergency braking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, (Diels & Parkes, 2009) have developed a technique based on the results of (Mourant et al, 2007). They change the geometric field of view (GFOV) i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing the geometric field of field (GFOV) while holding the projected field of view (PFOV) constant has been shown to increase users' perceived speed (Adetiloye, Wu, & Mourant, 2005;Mourant et al, 2007;Diels & Parkes, 2009 Mourant et al, 2007), selected speeds decreased with increases in the GFOV/PFOV ratio. Participants tended to underestimate their speeds at lower GFOV/PFOV ratios and overestimate their speeds at higher GFOV/PFOV ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%