2011 IEEE Symposium on Differential Evolution (SDE) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/sde.2011.5952059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposition-based Differential Evolution with protective generation jumping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To automatically tune the jumping rate of OBL, Rahnamayan et al proposed an ODE variant called ODE with a time-varying jumping rate (ODETVJR) and found that a linearly decreasing jumping rate is more effective than a linearly increasing one [61]. To prevent the waste of fitness evaluations, Esmailzadeh and Rahnamayan proposed an ODE variant called ODE with protective generation jumping (ODEPGJ), which stops OBL when the success rate of the opposite solutions decreases monotonously from a predefined threshold [62]. In [63], a quasi-ODE (QODE) was proposed, using quasi opposite solutions that were mathematically proven to be more likely to be located near the optimal solution of a given problem than opposite ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To automatically tune the jumping rate of OBL, Rahnamayan et al proposed an ODE variant called ODE with a time-varying jumping rate (ODETVJR) and found that a linearly decreasing jumping rate is more effective than a linearly increasing one [61]. To prevent the waste of fitness evaluations, Esmailzadeh and Rahnamayan proposed an ODE variant called ODE with protective generation jumping (ODEPGJ), which stops OBL when the success rate of the opposite solutions decreases monotonously from a predefined threshold [62]. In [63], a quasi-ODE (QODE) was proposed, using quasi opposite solutions that were mathematically proven to be more likely to be located near the optimal solution of a given problem than opposite ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of iBetaCODE and compared it to ten state-of-the-art ODE variants, namely: 1) ODE [13], 2) ODETVJR [61], 3) ODEPGJ [62], 4) QODE [63], 5) QRODE [64], 6) COODE [65], 7) GODE [66], 8) EODE [67], 9) AGODE [68], and 10) Beta-CODE [14]. For a fair comparison, we used the same classical DE variant DE/rand/1/bin; regarding the control parameters associated with the DE, we used the following values: F = 0.5, CR = 0.9, and NP = 100.…”
Section: Comparison With Ten Ode Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ continuous optimization functions, and the results revealed that the OBL strategy contributed to the metaheuristics' convergence. This work inspired the formulation of new OBL approaches, as well as their applications in different metaheuristics, such as Differential Evolution (DE) [6], [7], [8], [9], Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], Harmony Search (HS) [15], [16], [17],Simulated Annealing (SA) [18],Salp Swarm algorithms (SSA) [19], [20], [21] and SCA [2], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, many variants of the OBL strategy have been reported to strengthen MAs in terms of trade-offs between exploration and exploitation. The authors in [ 26 ] propose an opposition-based DE having a protective jumping rate, which achieves stopping the opposite operator when the success rate of the opposite individual falls to a constant threshold. In [ 27 ], OBL with the current optimum DE algorithm is proposed, and its concept is that instead of using the center point to calculate the opposite point, the best point of the current point is utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%