Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas

Abstract

A common approach to innovation, parallel search, is to identify a large number of opportunities and then to select a subset for further development, with just a few coming to fruition. One potential weakness with parallel search is that it permits repetition. The same, or a similar, idea might be generated multiple times, because parallel exploration processes typically operate without information about the ideas that have already been identified. In this paper we analyze repetition in five data sets comprising 1,368 opportunities and use that analysis to address three questions: (1) When a large number of efforts to generate ideas are conducted in parallel, how likely are the resulting ideas to be redundant? (2) How large are the opportunity spaces? (3) Are the unique ideas more valuable than those similar to many others? The answer to the first question is that although there is clearly some redundancy in the ideas generated by aggregating parallel efforts, this redundancy is quite small in absolute terms in our data, even for a narrowly defined domain. For the second question, we propose a method to extrapolate how many unique ideas would result from an unbounded effort by an unlimited number of comparable idea generators. Applying that method, and for the settings we study, the estimated total number of unique ideas is about one thousand for the most narrowly defined domain and greater than two thousand for the more broadly defined domains. On the third question, we find a positive relationship between the number of similar ideas and idea value: the ideas that are least similar to others are not generally the most valuable ones.Keywords search, opportunity, opportunities, idea, ideation, idea generation, innovation, creativity, innovation process, opportunity identification, concept development, product development, product design, entrepreneurship AbstractA common approach to innovation, parallel search, is to identify a large number of opportunities and then to select a subset for further development, with just a few coming to fruition. One potential weakness with parallel search is that it permits repetition. The same, or a similar, idea might be generated multiple times, as parallel exploration processes typically operate without information about the ideas that have already been identified. In this paper we analyze repetition in five data sets comprising 1,368 opportunities and use that analysis to address three questions:(1) When a large number of efforts to generate ideas are conducted in parallel, how likely are the resulting ideas to be redundant? (2) How large are the opportunity spaces? (3) Are the unique ideas more valuable than those similar to many others? The answer to the first question is that while there is clearly some redundancy in the ideas generated by aggregating parallel efforts, this redundancy is quite small in absolute terms in our data, even for a narrowly defined domain. For the second question, we propose a method to extrapolate how many unique ideas would result from ...

The Social Context of Decisions

“…Information jams encourage employees to post suggestions to a shared bulletin board and then vote good ideas up or down (although most systems do not blind the voter to the ratings of other participants, opening the door for influence). Kornish & Ulrich (2011) looked at the effectiveness of idea jams by having different populations generate new possible products for a given setting (e.g., for the web or for the classroom). Ideas were then provided to a different sample of participants to rate for quality.…”

Q&A. How Do Digital Platforms for Ideas, Technologies, and Knowledge Transfer Act as Enablers for Digital Transformation?

“…The assumption is that a good solution is more likely to emerge from many solvers than an individual solver. Some scholars argue that problem solving through innovation contests may generate similar or redundant solutions (Girotra et al, 2010), but others argue that, even though there might be a redundancy of solutions in parallel settings, it is insignificant even in a very narrow area (Kornish & Ulrich, 2011). Another example of a problem-solving platform is OpenIDEO (openideo.com), a global community used by many organizations to solve world's pressing problems.…”

Ideias para a inovação: um mapeamento sistemático da literatura

“…Kornish & Ulrich (2011) have studied the effectiveness of parallel efforts to the generation of ideas. They found through the study of a set of data that: although there is redundancy of ideas due to parallel efforts, it is small; and ideas which have a redundancy tend to be most valuable.…”

“…The authors concluded that there is a greater need for research to better understand the product concept phase. The works from Blau & McKinley (1979) and Kornish & Ulrich (2011) follow a similar path, since they studied the impact of ideas on organizational results.…”