2019
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities to integrate herders’ indicators into formal rangeland monitoring: an example from Mongolia

Abstract: Despite increasing calls for knowledge integration around the world, traditional knowledge is rarely used in formal, Western‐science‐based monitoring and resource management. To better understand indicators herders use and their relationship to researcher‐measured indicators, we conducted in‐depth field interviews with 26 herders in three ecological zones of Mongolia. We asked each herder to (1) assess the overall condition of three different sites located along a livestock‐use gradient from their winter camp … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MOR2 (Mongolian Rangelands and Resilience, also "mor" means "horse" in Mongolian) project started in 2008 as a large, 8year, national-scale project. Its goals were to understand climate and management impacts on rangelands and herder livelihoods, to assess the effects of community-based rangeland management (CBRM) institutions on social and ecological outcomes, and to understand the role of CBRM in system resilience to climatic and socio-economic changes Ulambayar et al, 2017;Jamsranjav et al, 2018Jamsranjav et al, , 2019Ulambayar and Fernández-Giménez, 2019).…”
Section: Mor2 Project Mongoliamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOR2 (Mongolian Rangelands and Resilience, also "mor" means "horse" in Mongolian) project started in 2008 as a large, 8year, national-scale project. Its goals were to understand climate and management impacts on rangelands and herder livelihoods, to assess the effects of community-based rangeland management (CBRM) institutions on social and ecological outcomes, and to understand the role of CBRM in system resilience to climatic and socio-economic changes Ulambayar et al, 2017;Jamsranjav et al, 2018Jamsranjav et al, , 2019Ulambayar and Fernández-Giménez, 2019).…”
Section: Mor2 Project Mongoliamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Armitage et al (2011) demonstrate that the combination of insights from biological science and place-based local knowledge of an Arctic fish species led to a revised understanding of the causes of fish declines and more precise management options for addressing them. The multiple benefits of these cross-knowledge collaborative approaches have been observed in other socialecological contexts, including whale conservation (Huntington 2000, Fernandez-Gimenez et al 2006; forest change (Chalmers and Fabricius 2007); sea ice change (Nichols et al 2004, Laidler 2006; rangeland management (Fernández-Giménez 2000, Reed et al 2013, Klein et al 2014, Jamsranjav et al 2019; and fish and wildlife monitoring (Moller et al 2004, Prado et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among other things, a better understanding of how local herders perceive landscape and pasture changes would be beneficial (cf. Gantuya et al 2019, Jamsranjav et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%