2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-014-0094-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and Challenges: Residents’ Perspectives on the Next Accreditation System in Psychiatry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the milestones have elicited criticism, it is premature to assess their effect on psychiatric training. As each training director uses the milestones to reevaluate the curriculum, as well as the educational and clinical environment of their program, it is anticipated that the milestones will demonstrate a significant impact (19).…”
Section: Milestone Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the milestones have elicited criticism, it is premature to assess their effect on psychiatric training. As each training director uses the milestones to reevaluate the curriculum, as well as the educational and clinical environment of their program, it is anticipated that the milestones will demonstrate a significant impact (19).…”
Section: Milestone Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the series of papers that follow in this issue of the journal [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the authors explain the new Psychiatry Milestones and the ways in which they were developed. We owe a great debt to the Working Group in its attempt to apply input from all the major stakeholders in psychiatric GME and its use of workshops, surveys, and 19 pilot projects to assess the feasibility of the Milestones.…”
Section: New Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…& Including elements of training that are already in practice but preparing educators for the future, as demonstrated by the new knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and incorporating novel concepts such as "human factors engineering" in systems-based practice, as more social science concepts are included in training. & Providing a systemic framework of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that allows for feedback and assessment by global ratings and, most important, by direct observation, emphasized extensively in all the papers in this cluster of the journal [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The authors are to be commended for clearly delineating anchors (through the threads) for formative assessment (feedback) and distinguishing it from summative assessment (evaluation) and the use of both by the clinical competency committees.…”
Section: New Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations