2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study

Abstract: Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
4
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, QCT is subject to higher radiation exposure and typically requires an in-scan calibration phantom, eliminating the option for routine BMD measurements in CT acquired for any indication. Recent studies proposed the use of CT numbers on regular clinically obtained conventional CT scans for the use of BMD assessment with varying sensitivity and specificity of 62–93% and 79–97%, respectively, when compared to DXA [ 7 10 ]. In addition, asynchronous BMD calibration using a separate phantom calibration scan, and internal BMD calibration using the paraspinal muscle and subcutaneous fat as reference materials, have been proposed [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, QCT is subject to higher radiation exposure and typically requires an in-scan calibration phantom, eliminating the option for routine BMD measurements in CT acquired for any indication. Recent studies proposed the use of CT numbers on regular clinically obtained conventional CT scans for the use of BMD assessment with varying sensitivity and specificity of 62–93% and 79–97%, respectively, when compared to DXA [ 7 10 ]. In addition, asynchronous BMD calibration using a separate phantom calibration scan, and internal BMD calibration using the paraspinal muscle and subcutaneous fat as reference materials, have been proposed [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oCT data has been shown to accurately correlate to current and future VCFs with diagnostic accuracy as high as 97.4% and AUC ¼ 0.978. 30,[44][45][46][47] oCT has outperformed DXA in the prediction of VCFs. 23,24 oCT has even been used to screen for cervical spine and hip fractures among the elderly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A study conducted by Bansal S C et al found QCT is more sensitive for diagnosing osteoporosis than DXA (12) . Several studies have shown a positive correlation between DXA and QCT or DXA with HU (8,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) . However, we have correlated bone mineral density by QCT with HU and found a strong positive correlation (r = 0.94).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%