Abstract:Currently opioids are the most frequently used medications for chronic noncancer pain. Opioid-induced constipation is the most common adverse effect associated with prolonged use of opioids, having a major impact on quality of life. There is an increasing need to treat opioid-induced constipation. With the recent approval of medications for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation, there are several therapeutic approaches. This review addresses the clinical presentation and diagnosis of opioid-induced cons… Show more
“…The exclusion criteria were: (1) known allergy towards opioids, (2) participation in any other studies within 14 days of enrolment, (3) planned medical/surgical treatment within the study duration, (4) a need to operate heavy machinery or motor vehicles during the study, (5) any previous or current drug abuse, (6) non-removable piercings or metal implants, (7) daily alcohol or nicotine consumption, (8) any known disease that may influence the results, and (9) the use of prescribed medicine and/or herbal medicine.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Several opioid receptor antagonists directly targeting the pathophysiology behind OIC have been introduced. Initial results have been promising, 8,9 but head-to-head comparison of these opioid antagonists versus conventional laxatives has not been conducted. Furthermore, considerable diversity in outcome measures used in previous trials makes comparison of efficacy difficult.…”
Background/AimsOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) side effect to opioid treatment. Opioid receptor antagonists against OIC have been introduced, but their efficacy has not been directly compared to conventional laxatives. Our aim was to compare symptoms and objective parameters of gut function in an experimental model of OIC during treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone and oxycodone in prolonged-release (PR) formulation versus oxycodone plus macrogol 3350.
MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial 20 healthy men received a 5-day treatment of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Regional GI transit times and segmental colorectal transit were assessed with the Motilis 3D-Transit electromagnetic capsule system. Colorectal volumes were determined by MRI. OIC symptoms were assessed with validated questionnaires, along with stool frequency and consistency.
ResultsTotal colorectal volume did not change after 5 days' treatment with PR oxycodone/naloxone (941 vs 1036 mL; P = 0.091), but increased significantly after PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment (912 vs 1123 mL; P < 0.001). Neither regional GI transit times nor segmental colorectal transit differed between the treatments (all P > 0.05). The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (0.2 vs 3.2; P = 0.002). Stool frequency was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (4.2 vs 5.4; P = 0.035).
ConclusionsPR oxycodone plus macrogol increases colorectal volume, but does not improve GI transit compared to PR oxycodone/naloxone. However, PR oxycodone/naloxone results in a lower abdominal symptom burden, despite higher stool frequency during macrogol treatment.
“…The exclusion criteria were: (1) known allergy towards opioids, (2) participation in any other studies within 14 days of enrolment, (3) planned medical/surgical treatment within the study duration, (4) a need to operate heavy machinery or motor vehicles during the study, (5) any previous or current drug abuse, (6) non-removable piercings or metal implants, (7) daily alcohol or nicotine consumption, (8) any known disease that may influence the results, and (9) the use of prescribed medicine and/or herbal medicine.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Several opioid receptor antagonists directly targeting the pathophysiology behind OIC have been introduced. Initial results have been promising, 8,9 but head-to-head comparison of these opioid antagonists versus conventional laxatives has not been conducted. Furthermore, considerable diversity in outcome measures used in previous trials makes comparison of efficacy difficult.…”
Background/AimsOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) side effect to opioid treatment. Opioid receptor antagonists against OIC have been introduced, but their efficacy has not been directly compared to conventional laxatives. Our aim was to compare symptoms and objective parameters of gut function in an experimental model of OIC during treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone and oxycodone in prolonged-release (PR) formulation versus oxycodone plus macrogol 3350.
MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial 20 healthy men received a 5-day treatment of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Regional GI transit times and segmental colorectal transit were assessed with the Motilis 3D-Transit electromagnetic capsule system. Colorectal volumes were determined by MRI. OIC symptoms were assessed with validated questionnaires, along with stool frequency and consistency.
ResultsTotal colorectal volume did not change after 5 days' treatment with PR oxycodone/naloxone (941 vs 1036 mL; P = 0.091), but increased significantly after PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment (912 vs 1123 mL; P < 0.001). Neither regional GI transit times nor segmental colorectal transit differed between the treatments (all P > 0.05). The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (0.2 vs 3.2; P = 0.002). Stool frequency was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (4.2 vs 5.4; P = 0.035).
ConclusionsPR oxycodone plus macrogol increases colorectal volume, but does not improve GI transit compared to PR oxycodone/naloxone. However, PR oxycodone/naloxone results in a lower abdominal symptom burden, despite higher stool frequency during macrogol treatment.
“…Bei unzureichendem Ansprechen auf Laxanzien kann der kausale Wirk ansatz von peripher wirkenden μ-Opioid-Rezeptor-Antagonisten (PAMORA) wie Naloxegol (Moventig ® ) zur effektiven Behandlung der OIC beitragen [6] und eine dosisgerechte Durchführung der Schmerztherapie gewährleisten, wie PD Dr. Stefan Wirz, Bad Honnef, in einem Interview berichtet. Eine OIC kann jederzeit nach Einleitung einer Opioid-Therapie und bereits bei Verwendung schwacher Opioid-Analgetika und bei niedrigen Dosierungen auftreten [7,8]. Die Folge ist das Auftreten von zum Beispiel hartem Stuhlgang und mühevoller, oft inkompletter Stuhlentleerung sowie begleitend auftretendes Völlegefühl, Bauchdruck und -schmerzen, Blähungen, Übelkeit und Erbrechen [9][10][11].…”
“…These include mediation of cardiovascular functions, 5 visceral and inflammatory pain relief, 6 cell death and survival, 7 and smooth muscle contraction. 8 For instance, there is growing interest in peripheral opioid analgesics to evade the central side effects of respiratory depression and euphoria, 6 while peripheral antagonists are indispensable for clinical management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. 8b Moreover, opioid receptors are over-expressed by several types of cancer, and are emerging as molecular oncology targets for imaging and therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 For instance, there is growing interest in peripheral opioid analgesics to evade the central side effects of respiratory depression and euphoria, 6 while peripheral antagonists are indispensable for clinical management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. 8b Moreover, opioid receptors are over-expressed by several types of cancer, and are emerging as molecular oncology targets for imaging and therapy. 9 For illustration, PET imaging of lung cancer patients shows high levels of μ and δ opioid receptors on primary lung tumors as compared to normal lung.…”
Radiolabeled diprenorphine (DPN) and analogs are widely used ligands for non-invasive brain imaging of opioid receptors. To develop complementary radioligands optimized for studies of the peripheral opioid receptors, we prepared a pair of hydrophilic DPN derivatives, conjugated to the macrocyclic chelator DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid), for complexation with trivalent metals. The non-radioactive indium (III) complexes, tethered to the C6-oxygen position of the DPN scaffold by 6- to 9-atom spacers, displayed high affinities for binding to μ, δ and κ opioid receptors in vitro. Use of the 9-atom linker conferred picomolar affinities equipotent to those of the parent ligand DPN. The [111In]-labeled complexes were prepared in good yield (>70%), with high radiochemical purity (~99%) and high specific radioactivity (>4000 mCi/μmol). Their log D7.4 values were −2.21 to −1.66. In comparison, DPN is lipophilic, with a log D7.4 of +2.25. Further study in vivo is warranted to assess the suitability of these [111In]-labeled DPN-DOTA conjugates for imaging trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.