The 3D-Transit system now allows detailed description of colonic motility and our results are supported by those previously suggested by manometry. It holds promise for future assessment of movement patterns to characterize different diseases and effects of treatment.

Background The 3D‐Transit electromagnet tracking system (Motilis Medica, SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) is an emerging tool for the ambulatory assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) transit and motility. Using this tool, we aimed to derive normative values for region‐specific colonic and GI transit times and to assess the influence of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Methods Regional and total colonic transit times (CTT), gastric emptying (GET), small intestinal (SITT), and whole gut (WGTT) transit times were extracted from 111 healthy volunteers from the United Kingdom and Denmark (58 female; median age: 40 years [range: 21‐88]). The effects of age, gender, and BMI were assessed using standard statistical methods. Key Results The ascending, transverse, descending, and rectosigmoid colon transit times accounted for 32%, 34%, 17%, and 17% of total CTT in females, and 33%, 25%, 14%, and 28% of total CTT in males. CTT and WGTT were seen to cluster at intervals separated by approximately 24 hours, providing further evidence of the non‐continuous nature of these measurements. Increasing age was associated with longer CTT (P = .021), WGTT (P < .001) ascending (P = .004), transverse (P < .001), and total right (P < .001) colon transit times, but shorter rectosigmoid (P = .004) transit time. Female gender was significantly associated with longer transverse (P = .049) and descending (P < .001) colon transit times, but shorter rectosigmoid (P < .001) transit time. Increasing BMI was significantly associated with shorter WGTT (P = .012). Conclusions and Inferences For the first time, normative reference values for region‐specific colonic transit have been presented. Age, gender, and BMI were seen to have an effect on transit times.

The 3D-Transit system allows accurate and reliable determination of colorectal length compared with MRI-derived colorectal length and between days. Antegrade or retrograde capsule movement relative to this centreline, as well as the length and speed of movements, may be determined by future studies to allow better classification and treatment in patients with dysmotility.

Background/AimsOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) side effect to opioid treatment. Opioid receptor antagonists against OIC have been introduced, but their efficacy has not been directly compared to conventional laxatives. Our aim was to compare symptoms and objective parameters of gut function in an experimental model of OIC during treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone and oxycodone in prolonged-release (PR) formulation versus oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial 20 healthy men received a 5-day treatment of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Regional GI transit times and segmental colorectal transit were assessed with the Motilis 3D-Transit electromagnetic capsule system. Colorectal volumes were determined by MRI. OIC symptoms were assessed with validated questionnaires, along with stool frequency and consistency. ResultsTotal colorectal volume did not change after 5 days' treatment with PR oxycodone/naloxone (941 vs 1036 mL; P = 0.091), but increased significantly after PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment (912 vs 1123 mL; P < 0.001). Neither regional GI transit times nor segmental colorectal transit differed between the treatments (all P > 0.05). The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (0.2 vs 3.2; P = 0.002). Stool frequency was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (4.2 vs 5.4; P = 0.035). ConclusionsPR oxycodone plus macrogol increases colorectal volume, but does not improve GI transit compared to PR oxycodone/naloxone. However, PR oxycodone/naloxone results in a lower abdominal symptom burden, despite higher stool frequency during macrogol treatment.

Background/AimsOpioids cause gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility, decrease gut secretion, and affect gut sphincters. Symptoms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction may be alleviated by peripherally acting opioid antagonists like naloxegol, but detailed knowledge on GI effects of this drug is lacking. We hypothesized that naloxegol, compared to placebo, would reduce GI transit time and colonic fecal volume in opioid-treated healthy participants. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blinded, single-center, 2-way cross-over study in 24 healthy males, randomized to a 6 day treatment period of oxycodone (15 mg twice a day) co-administered with either naloxegol (25 mg once a day) or matching placebo. Participants swallowed an electromagnetic capsule which determined GI transit times. Colonic fecal volume was quantified with magnetic resonance imaging both pre-treatment and post-treatment. ResultsNaloxegol reduced total GI transit time by 21% (56 hours vs 71 hours, P = 0.02) and colonic transit time by 23% (45 hours vs 59 hours, P < 0.01), compared to placebo. However, no difference in colonic fecal volume was found (818 mL vs 884 mL, P = 0.20). ConclusionsShort-term administration of naloxegol in healthy participants reverses the retardation of total GI and colonic transit induced by oxycodone. This supports the use of naloxegol in the treatment of GI side effects to opioid treatment, and add knowledge to the current understanding of mechanisms behind peripherally-acting opioid antagonists. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019;25:602-610)

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to characterize the cortical source generators evoked by experimental tonic pain.MethodsElectroencephalography (EEG) was recorded on two separate days during rest and with immersion of the hand in ice water for 2 minutes (cold pressor test). Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography source localization was performed in 31 healthy volunteers to characterize the cortical source generators.ResultsReliability was high in all eight frequency bands during rest and cold pressor conditions (intraclass coefficients =0.47–0.83 in the cingulate and insula). Tonic pain increased cortical activities in the delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), beta1 (12–18 Hz), beta2 (18–24 Hz), beta3 (24–32 Hz), and gamma (32–60 Hz) bands (all P<0.011) in widespread areas mainly in the limbic system, whereas decreased cortical activities were found in cingulate and pre- and postcentral gyri in the alpha2 (10–12 Hz) band (P=0.007). The pain intensity was correlated with cingulate activity in the beta2, beta3, and gamma bands (all P<0.04).ConclusionSource localization of EEG is a reliable method to estimate cortical source generators. Activities in different brain regions, mainly in the limbic system, showed fluctuations in various frequency bands. Cingulate changes were correlated with pain intensity.SignificanceThis method might add information to the objective assessment of the cortical pain response in future experimental pain studies.

Background Opioid treatment often causes debilitating constipation. However, it is not well described how opioids affect colonic motility and whether opioid‐induced constipation is due to either a decrease of powerful peristaltic contractions or “uncoordinated” peristalsis. The present study aims to investigate the effect of oxycodone on parameters of colonic motility and to determine whether motility is normalized by the opioid antagonist naloxegol. Methods In two randomized, double‐blind crossover trials, oxycodone or placebo was administered to 25 healthy males (Trial A), while another 24 healthy males were administered oxycodone with naloxegol or placebo (Trial B). Colonic motility was assessed by tracking the progression of an electromagnetic capsule throughout the large intestine. Segmental colonic transit times and capsule movements were calculated using displacement distance and velocity. Key Results In Trial A, colonic transit time increased during oxycodone treatment compared with placebo (39 vs 18 hours, P < .01). Displacement during long fast antegrade movements was shorter during oxycodone treatment than with placebo (10 vs 20 cm, P = .03). In Trial B, colonic transit time was faster during oxycodone + naloxegol than during oxycodone + placebo (40 vs 55 hours, P = .049), mainly caused by an increase of the percentwise fraction of distance covered by fast movements in the left colon (P = .001). Conclusion & Inferences Oxycodone treatment impaired colonic motility, manifested as increased transit time, specifically decreased long fast antegrade movements, and addition of naloxegol improved motility dynamics. In humans, the increased transit time during opioid treatment is caused by a decrease in long fast movements rather than uncoordinated peristalsis.

Background: Tapentadol is a combined opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with fewer gastrointestinal side effects at equianalgesic doses compared with classical strong opioids. Previous studies on tapentadol have included multimorbid patients in whom confounders exclude detailed assessment of the mechanistic effects and strict comparison with other opioids or placebo. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tapentadol and oxycodone on gastrointestinal motility and gastrointestinal side effects.Methods: 21 healthy males participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, crossover study. Tapentadol (50 mg twice daily), oxycodone (10 mg twice daily), or placebo tablets were administered for 14 days. Segmental gastrointestinal transit times and colonic motility parameters were measured with electromagnetic capsules. Gastrointestinal side effects were assessed using questionnaires.Key Results: During dosing with tapentadol, gastrointestinal side effects and motility parameters were on placebo level. Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone increased whole gut transit time by 17.9 hours (p = .015) and rectosigmoid transit time by 6.5 hours (p = .005). Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone also reduced long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .001). In comparison with placebo, oxycodone prolonged whole gut transit time by 31.6 hours, (p < .001). Moreover, less long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .002) were observed during oxycodone. For oxycodone only, slow colonic movements were associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Conclusions & Inferences:In this mechanistic study, tapentadol caused significantly less colonic dysmotility and gastrointestinal side effects as compared with oxycodone in equianalgesic doses.