1961
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1961.00960010203009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ophthalmodynamometry in the Surgical Management of Carotid Arterial Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the ophthalmic pressures in pairs of eyes for all 20 patients was 24.1 ± 3.03 (20) (23). In the remaining 15 eyes the OAP/BrAP ratio was 0.45 ± 0.04 (15), and the mean degree of stenosis in the ipsilateral ICAs was 36.5 ± 7.9 (15) %. Figure 4 summarizes the relationship between the percentage stenosis of the ICA determined by arteriography and the ratio of the OAP/BrAP in the ipsilateral eye.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The difference in the ophthalmic pressures in pairs of eyes for all 20 patients was 24.1 ± 3.03 (20) (23). In the remaining 15 eyes the OAP/BrAP ratio was 0.45 ± 0.04 (15), and the mean degree of stenosis in the ipsilateral ICAs was 36.5 ± 7.9 (15) %. Figure 4 summarizes the relationship between the percentage stenosis of the ICA determined by arteriography and the ratio of the OAP/BrAP in the ipsilateral eye.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In carotid occlusion, the fall in pressure in the ophthalmic artery has been recorded by ophthalmodynamometry as more than 20 per cent by Smith (1961a) and Lieberman and Schimek (1961); 29-86 per cent by Spalter (1959); 50 per cent by Bakay andSweet (1953)~ Hollenhorst, Wilbur, andSvien (1957), and Blodi and van Allen (1957); and 50-70 per cent by Hollenhorst (1958Hollenhorst ( , 1959. It has been suggested that a comparison of ophthalmodynamometric values obtained with the patient standing and supine enhances the sensitivity and diagnostic usefulness of the test.…”
Section: I00mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other au thors have suggested that a significant difference is more than 20% 8 or more than 25%. 9 The second crite rion is a formalization of the widely held notion that bilateral carotid occlusive disease leads to bilaterally low retinal artery pressures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%