High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16638-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ophthalmic Diagnostic Imaging: Glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, significant overlap between normal variability and early disease aggravates the diagnostic dilemma. Imaging offers the ability to document and objectively quantify the diagnostic parameters and structural changes over time 15 …”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, significant overlap between normal variability and early disease aggravates the diagnostic dilemma. Imaging offers the ability to document and objectively quantify the diagnostic parameters and structural changes over time 15 …”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard automated perimetry-based VF performance remains the benchmark for assessing the intensity of glaucomatous injury [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 29 , 30 ]. Epidemiological and experimental studies have shown glaucomatous RGC loss precedes the apparition of VF defects [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] because structural alterations occur before the onset of functional changes [ 35 , 36 ]. Therefore, the absence of symptoms and inadvertent signs, mainly during the earlier glaucoma stages (such as in pre-perimetric glaucoma cases and early perimetric glaucoma patients), complicates glaucoma diagnosis and overshadows the visual prognosis of affected individuals [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 On the other hand, data such as OCT and SAP MD values, as well as ophthalmic exams leading to clinical diagnoses may provide a more objective standard for comparison. 83 Even if an algorithm is trained on images with human labels, it is possible that it may perform better when tested on a dataset grounded in more objective rather than subjective criteria. For example, Shibata et al 39 trained a DL algorithm using a glaucoma specialist's manual grading of fundus images.…”
Section: Table 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Medeiros et al 60 proposed a novel approach in which objective quantifiable data from OCT was used as the reference standard. OCT provides highly reproducible imaging data 83 and has thus become the most commonly utilized imaging modality for diagnosis of structural damage from glaucoma. By pairing CFPs to their corresponding OCT RNFL global thickness values, Medeiros et al 60 trained a "machine-to-machine" algorithm that could assess optic disc photographs and predict the average RNFL thickness.…”
Section: Table 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%