1964
DOI: 10.1109/thfe.1964.231649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Decision Performance Using Probabilistic Displays of Object Location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a demonstrable learning effect with feedback for the interpolated repeated decision task is not consistent with findings such as those of Dale (1962), but is consistent with results reported in Herman et al (1964) for With an opportunity to exercise only 40 decisions over 10 alternatives, it is not possible to sample all alternatives adequately to gain experience with outcome. Given advance knowledge that there would be a limit of 40 decisions, 5s appeared to restrict their choices to some initially preferred subset of the 10.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of a demonstrable learning effect with feedback for the interpolated repeated decision task is not consistent with findings such as those of Dale (1962), but is consistent with results reported in Herman et al (1964) for With an opportunity to exercise only 40 decisions over 10 alternatives, it is not possible to sample all alternatives adequately to gain experience with outcome. Given advance knowledge that there would be a limit of 40 decisions, 5s appeared to restrict their choices to some initially preferred subset of the 10.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Interpolated decision task.-This task was identical to the repeated decision problem specified in Herman et al (1964), requiring that 5 1 select 1 of 10 time stages of an attack mission to "fire" at a target. A conventional target location display was used, with true values of the probability parameters (probability of hitting the target at each stage) provided S a priori.…”
Section: Experiments I Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such confidence computations can be used in order to prune out estimates that do not pass a predefined confidence threshold. The notion of presenting this confidence estimate to users as additional information was suggested many decades ago (Herman, Ornstein, & Bahrick, 1964).…”
Section: Confidence In a Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%