1967
DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(67)90022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple regression as a model for human information utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of such a molecular focus in providing empirically weighted guidelines for clinicians regarding "what to look for" or "what to assign priority to" for particular clinical tasks was actualized by Gunderson and Kapfer (1 966) through the use of regression analysis techniques. This trend toward more sophisticated use of statistical, mathmatical, and computerbased models for investigating clinical inference unquestionably has been on the increase (Beach, 1967; Gaier & Lee, 1 9 5 3 ; Goldberg, 1970;Hammond, Hursch, & Todd, 1964;Hoffman, 1960;Hoffman, Slovic, & Rorer, 1968;Mirabile, Houck, & Glueck, 1971;Sarbin, Taft, & Bailey, 1960;Shipley, Powell, & Harley, 1970;Sines, 1966;Snapper & Peterson, 1971;Stone, 1970;Stone & Linscheid, 1971;Stroebel & Glueck, 1970;Warr & Smith, 1970;and, Wiggins & Hoffman, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of such a molecular focus in providing empirically weighted guidelines for clinicians regarding "what to look for" or "what to assign priority to" for particular clinical tasks was actualized by Gunderson and Kapfer (1 966) through the use of regression analysis techniques. This trend toward more sophisticated use of statistical, mathmatical, and computerbased models for investigating clinical inference unquestionably has been on the increase (Beach, 1967; Gaier & Lee, 1 9 5 3 ; Goldberg, 1970;Hammond, Hursch, & Todd, 1964;Hoffman, 1960;Hoffman, Slovic, & Rorer, 1968;Mirabile, Houck, & Glueck, 1971;Sarbin, Taft, & Bailey, 1960;Shipley, Powell, & Harley, 1970;Sines, 1966;Snapper & Peterson, 1971;Stone, 1970;Stone & Linscheid, 1971;Stroebel & Glueck, 1970;Warr & Smith, 1970;and, Wiggins & Hoffman, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research has been focused upon constructing mathematical models which explain the decision making behavior of individuals (e.g., Christal [10], Goldberg [19], Slovic [38], Ashton [2], Zedeck and Kafry [44], and Dawes [14]). In nearly all instances, a linear model has adequately modeled the relationship between an individual's decisions and the criteria used to arrive at those decisions (Hoffman [24], Beach [4], Darlington [13], Dawes and Corri-gan [15], Keren and Newman [27], Laughlin [28], and Dawes [14] ). Consequently, researchers frequently model individuals' decision making behavior via the following linear model:…”
Section: Behavioral Decision Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%