2012
DOI: 10.1108/09574091211289237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational routines and supply chain competencies of Chinese logistics service providers

Abstract: PurposeThough resource based view (RBV) has been applied extensively in supply chain studies to examine how firms utilize logistics resources to attain superior performance, relatively little attention has been directed to exploring the effects of operational routines on logistics and supply chain (L&SC) competencies. The purpose of this paper is to examine the causal linkages between operational routines and L&SC competencies of Chinese logistics service providers (LSPs).Design/methodology/approachA conceptua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted earlier, there is a need for additional research on international perspectives. While there are examples of excellent international research occurring outside of our reviewed journals (e.g., Ding et al., 2012), these top scholarly outlets do not preclude international studies. As such, we believe there is an opportunity for greater international research in these top scholarly journals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, there is a need for additional research on international perspectives. While there are examples of excellent international research occurring outside of our reviewed journals (e.g., Ding et al., 2012), these top scholarly outlets do not preclude international studies. As such, we believe there is an opportunity for greater international research in these top scholarly journals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production-management literature deals first not only with efficiency and flexibility aspects (Ngai et al, 2011;Schoenherr and Narasimhan, 2012) but also with process development to increase process stability, reduce variances and thereby increase quality (Kim and Wemmerloev, 2015). Literature on logistics management deals with competence relating to capacity issues and the range of logistical offers (Ding et al, 2012), along with inventory management (Jasemi et al, 2014). It also deals with competence in delivery and returns management, including fast and correct deliveries to customers (Halley and Beaulieu, 2009), and a systematic returns-flow process (Morgan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Functional Competence In Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Halley and Beaulieu (2009),Halley et al (2010),Mollenkopf and Dapiran (2005), Pyne et alAmbulkar et al (2016),Barnes and Liao (2012),Blome et al (2013),Chiadamrong and Suppakitjarak (2008),Das and Narasimhan (2000),Davis and Golicic (2010),Ding et al (2012),Ding et al (2015),Ellinger et al (2015),Essex et al (2016), Feldmann andOlhager (2013),Golini et al (2014),Green et al (2014),Ha et al (2011), Hsu et al (2011), Huo et al (2015,Kern et al (2011),Kim and Wemmerloev (2015),Kusaba et al (2011), Ling-Yee and Ogunmokun (2001), Marcus and Anderson (2006), Morgan et al (2016), Myers et al (2004), Paulraj et al (2008), Richey et al (2007), Rosenzweig and Roth (2007), Roth et al (2008), Salvador and Villena (2013), Sangari. and Razmi (2015), Schoenherr et al (2014), Schoenherr and Narasimhan (2012), Spekman et al (2002), Stentoft Arlbjørn et al (2006), Stuart, 2012, Sun (2013), Torkkeli (2014), Whipple et al (2015), Wieland and Wallenburg (2013), Zacharia (2011) 39 Qualitative 18 Case study Berlak and Weber (2004), Bernon and Mena (2013), Fulconis et al (2006), Hanna (2007), Lutz and Ritter (2009), Parry et al (2006), Parry et al (2010), Samuel and Spalanzani (2009), Sauber et al (2008), Wadhwa et al (2008) 10 Case-based testing Armoutis et al (2008), Barclay (2005), Jüttner et al (2006), Lin et al (2016), Møller et al (2003), Ngai et al (2011), Perunović et al ), Drejer and Sørensen (2002), Ellinger and Ellinger (2014), Halley and Beaulieu (2001), Halley et al (2006), Harvey and Richey (2001), Malekifar et al (2014), Margherita et al (2009), Richey et al (2010), Richey and Wheeler (2004), Rogers et al (2013), Tokman et al (2011), Wang et al (…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Mollenkopf and Dapiran (2005) one of the main streams of logistics research, introduced in 1995 by The Michigan State University Global Logistics Research Team (MSUGLRT), after many years of rigorous research work, climaxed in the shape of 21 st Century Logistics Framework which is referred as World Class Logistics Competencies Model (WCLCM). Just after the inception of MSUGLRT logistics competency model researchers like Cho, Ozment and Sink (2008), Ding, Kam and Lalwani (2012), Goldsby and Stank (2000), Kuo-Chung & Li-Fang (2004), Li and Lin (2006), Lynch, Keller and Ozment (2000), Shang and Marlow (2007) and Zhao, Droge and Stank (2001) discussing the WCLCMs, considered MSUGLRT logistics competency model as the most famous, thorough and appropriate logistics service competency model. Xu and Wang (2012) claimed it to be so far the largest study which determined 17 general-purpose logistics capabilities from 32 possible elements of logistics service competencies.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%