2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational performance of U.S. public rail transit and implications for public policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we employ an iterative algorithm that alternates between an input-oriented step and an output-oriented step (Mallikarjun et al, 2014).…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we employ an iterative algorithm that alternates between an input-oriented step and an output-oriented step (Mallikarjun et al, 2014).…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Althin and Behrenz, 2004;Waldo, 2007;Hsu and Hsueh, 2009;Mallikarjun et al, 2014, andtruncated regression in Puenpatom andRosenman, 2008;Tochkov et al, 2012;Czyźewski et al, 2020). In the context of panel data, instead, panel models are implemented (see Zhang et al, 2011;Papadimitriou and Johnes, 2019).…”
Section: Determinant-wise Focus Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and external costs (covering delivery costs, impact on society such as noise, pollution, etc.). Mallikarjun et al (2014) developed a framework to measure the performance of a rail transit system. They developed an appropriate benchmarking system and tried to capture various causes of inefficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%