Operational flexibility quantification in a make-to-order assembly system

Abstract

Manufacturing flexibility is becoming a fundamental production objective, along with cost, quality, and delivery time. Current production systems face quick changes in market conditions and they need to adapt in this environment. The supply chain and industrial globalization give an important role for assembly systems. Placed at the end of the value chain, assembly systems must face those quick changes successfully to reach the expected performance. The key performance indicators are normally based on cost, quality, and delivery time objectives. Reducing costs and improving quality are almost universal goals. Delivery time is typically determined by customer demand in the supply chain, planning from make-to-stock to make-to-order, and aspiring to reach a just-in-time manufacturing system. In this context, flexibility could be the differential advantage to tackle uncertainty. Closely related to the rest of production objectives and the overall performance of the system, flexibility must be integrated in the system for successful decision-making in operations. This work presents this approach of flexibility. A brief review of flexibility concepts and measurements in the literature precedes an introduction to flexibility, defined based on the function of utility. This function represents the expectations of system performance. This approach allows the formulation of the taxonomy of operational flexibility in agreement with the classical types identified in former works. Next, an integer model is programmed to simulate the basic behavior of task planning in a make-to-order assembly system. This first application illustrates flexibility quantification based on utility evolution. The use of common industrial parameters to quantify operational flexibility will finally facilitate an integrated interpretation of system performance trends.

Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment Method (NERPA) Using Product-Process Computer Aided Engineering for Ergonomic Workplace Design

“…Simulation tools are already widely used in different fields of product-process engineering, such as the study of mechanical behavior, vibro-acoustic feedback from different controls, or machine parameter estimates in manufacturing processes [3,4]. When using these tools, it is necessary to define the material characteristics and to use a good standard that determines the model that would best represent the performance of the system.…”

Joint Optimization of Process Flow and Scheduling in Service-Oriented Manufacturing Systems

“…The internal objective requires operations with a proper resource assignation, so that the full capacity of the facility should be used effectively under variable demand. The implications of the operations under uncertainty involves trade-offs of service ratios and manufacturing flexibility [ 45 ], including the external position (market share) and internal performance (maximum capacity compatible with the intended service ratios and proper resources utilization at partial load).…”

“…The situation of overload might not be an ordinary state and it can be considered to establish facility design boundaries or expansion flexibility [ 45 ]. Focusing on the ordinary range of operations, the total unitary cost is similar for both process flows.…”

Influence Mechanism of Organizational Flexibility on Enterprise Competitiveness: The Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation

“…In addition, previous research explored multiple types of flexibility from different perspectives and their importance. Key elements include product development [52], supply chain [53], process [47,55], operational [115,116], strategic [117], leadership [56,57], project team [58], financial, structural, technological [35], cross-cultural [59], contractual [60], and human resource flexibilities [54]. However, existing literature exploring construction industry PBEs OF is scarce.…”