No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The development of multidrug resistance (MDR) to chemotherapy remains a major challenge in the treatment of cancer. Numerous mechanisms have been recognized that cause MDR, but one of the most important mechanisms is overexpression of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, through which the efflux of various anticancer drugs against their concentration gradients is powered by ATP. In recent years, small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for treatment in various human cancers overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). At the same time, some TKIs have been shown to be capable of inhibiting ABC transporter-mediated MDR. Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is a second generation, irreversible TKI, which has shown positive anticancer activities in some preclinical and clinical trials. As many TKIs are substrates or inhibitors of ABC transporters, this study investigates whether dacomitinib could interact with ABC subfamily members that mediate MDR, including ABCB1 (P-gp), ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCC1 (MRP1). The results showed that dacomitinib at 1.0 μM significantly reversed drug resistance mediated by ABCB1 and ABCG2, but not ABCC1, doing so by antagonizing the drug efflux function in ABCB1- and ABCG2-overexpressing cell lines. The reversal effect on ABCB1-overexpressing cells is more potent than that on ABCG2-overexpressing cells. In addition, dacomitinib at reversal concentration affected neither the protein expression level nor the localization of ABCB1 and ABCG2. Therefore, the mechanisms of this modulating effect are likely to be the following: first, as an inhibitor of ABCB1 or ABCG2 transporters, dacomitinib binds to drug-substrate site in transmembrane domains (TMD) stably in a noncompetitive manner; or second, dacomitinib inhibits ATPase activity and maintains the stability of TMD conformation in a concentration-dependent manner thereby inhibiting the drug efflux function of ABCB1 or ABCG2 transporter. This study provides a useful combinational therapeutic strategy with dacomitinib and substrates of ABCB1 and/or ABCG2 transporters in ABCB1- or ABCG2-overexpressing cancers.

Mitochondria play a key role in ATP generation, redox homeostasis and regulation of apoptosis. Due to the essential role of mitochondria in metabolism and cell survival, targeting mitochondria in cancer cells is considered as an attractive therapeutic strategy. However, metabolic flexibility in cancer cells may enable the upregulation of compensatory pathways, such as glycolysis to support cancer cell survival when mitochondrial metabolism is inhibited. Thus, compounds capable of both targeting mitochondria and inhibiting glycolysis may be particularly useful to overcome such drug-resistant mechanism. This review provides an update on recent development in the field of targeting mitochondria and novel compounds that impact mitochondria, glycolysis or both. Key challenges in this research area and potential solutions are also discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

Capital structure and revenue-sharing agreements lie in the essence of balancing public and private interests in public–private partnership (PPP) contracts. In the United States, many PPP projects may not be fully self-financed through tolls or other user fees because of insufficient revenue streams. With a limited debt capacity secured by toll revenues, most PPP projects must be supported by both private equity investments and public funds. The equity structure is critical in a PPP contract because it implies risk and profit sharing and therefore provides a mechanism for private incentive and protection of the public interest. This paper presents a structured approach to determining the debt–equity investment in PPP projects. Scenarios are generated by using linear programming and probability programming models to reach the optimal equity structure under risk and uncertainty. The I-10 connector project is used as a case study to demonstrate the optimization process. The model is especially useful for public agencies to (a) estimate the range of private equity investment, (b) determine the target equity structure, and (c) document the benefits and costs of private financing for a successful PPP contract.