2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operation patterns analysis of automotive components remanufacturing industry development in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the MCDM problem [38], that is evaluating the design alternatives by the gray relational closeness index (R) among data sequences as a measurement scale through analyzing similarity curve geometry and geometric relations among data sequences [27,28]. Note that the closer the curve, the larger the R. The detailed procedures could be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Gra Methods Gra Methods Was Proposed To Solvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the MCDM problem [38], that is evaluating the design alternatives by the gray relational closeness index (R) among data sequences as a measurement scale through analyzing similarity curve geometry and geometric relations among data sequences [27,28]. Note that the closer the curve, the larger the R. The detailed procedures could be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Gra Methods Gra Methods Was Proposed To Solvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of main methodologies for solving this problem by former researchers is revealed briefly in this section. Some MCDM methods, e.g., AHP, analytic network process (ANP), GRA, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and Decision-Making and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and integrated approaches, e.g., gray-based DEMATEL and GC-TOPSIS, have been successfully presented and utilized to solve the GSCM problem [3,13,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of the combinations (m, n) is generated, where m and n are the number of machines and jobs, respectively. In this study, all the instances are (3, 10), (4,15), (5,24), (6,32), (7,26), (8,42), and (9, 56), respectively. The total amount of resources in each combination (m, n) is set to R = m + 1, m + 2, m + 3, respectively.…”
Section: Test Instance Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future work, it is necessary to carry out a sensitivity analysis on the parameter setting in the proposed algorithm. It is also interesting to deal with the dynamic resource allocation in flexible manufacturing systems [39] and process industry systems [40][41][42][43][44]. In addition, multiobjective scheduling with dynamic resource allocation is also valuable because of its widespread applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type is the objective weighting method, such as entropy weight method [14], variation coefficient method, correlation coefficient method, weighted average planning method [15] and TOPSIS method [16,17]. The other type is the combination method of subjectivity and objectivity [18][19][20], such as ELECTRE method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [21,22] and PROMETHEE and so forth [23]. Moreover, two weight optimization methods based on variance maximization are proposed in a previous research [24], which discusses the multi-index comprehensive evaluation model considering two different conditions respectively (for example with prior information and without prior information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%