“…Authors from the Marxist-Maoist tradition(Bettelheim, 1976;Magaline, 1977; Linhart, 1983) are radically averse to the theses of technological determinism which caused theoretical and social harm in the twentieth century, either through Stalinist stages (capitalism-socialism-communism), based on an almost Saint-Simonian understanding of the progress of technique and industry as a means of overcoming capitalism, or within the debate on the forms of political organisation and revolutionary 'consciousness', interpreted in accordance with the primacy of the productive forces.8 The relation of productive forces to the relations of production is the background for the demonstration of our arguments, except for the cases when we see this relationship being mistakenly recovered by the theses of digital workerism(Englert, Woodcock & Cant, 2020). It is more properly demonstrated when we show the basis on which the new nucleus of subordination of the working class is constituted, developed in a long process of technological, managerial and scientific maturation, that creates the basis for the structural materialisation of digital platforms as the current, but not final(Gramsci, 2001), form of industrial production.…”