The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1587/comex.4.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OpenStack hypervisor, container and Baremetal servers performance comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The BM implementation can provide direct access to hardware for configurability, reducing the overheads for computing and for hardware interactions for I/O. The application performance on BM as compared to abstracted hardware, i.e., on a VM or container, has been examined in Yamato et al [99].…”
Section: ) Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BM implementation can provide direct access to hardware for configurability, reducing the overheads for computing and for hardware interactions for I/O. The application performance on BM as compared to abstracted hardware, i.e., on a VM or container, has been examined in Yamato et al [99].…”
Section: ) Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, OpenStack is open source IaaS software and Cloud Foundry is open source PaaS software, and we can use them for cloud application development and operation. We previously contributed to the development of OpenStack and many cloud providers such as NTT Communications adopt OpenStack and Cloud Foundry for their cloud services [20], [21], [22].…”
Section: Proposed Platform Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, IoT and cloud technologies have progressed. Manufacturing and maintenance are hot areas for IoT applications, and IoT platforms have also been created to develop and operate IoT applications effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%