2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Openness, rural-urban inequality, and happiness in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, schools seemed to have made some effort to provide some openness, but it was either inadequate or superficial and, as a result, there was no actual equity among students of the same school and within the student body in general. These findings are in line with the findings of Ma and Chen (2020), Olakulehin and Singh (2013) and Tynan and James (2013), who highlight the existence of social inequities and problems that are ultimately reproduced in the school environment, dividing students into categories, regarding their financial class and cultural background.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, schools seemed to have made some effort to provide some openness, but it was either inadequate or superficial and, as a result, there was no actual equity among students of the same school and within the student body in general. These findings are in line with the findings of Ma and Chen (2020), Olakulehin and Singh (2013) and Tynan and James (2013), who highlight the existence of social inequities and problems that are ultimately reproduced in the school environment, dividing students into categories, regarding their financial class and cultural background.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Openness is presented as a panacea and agent of democracy, even in countries with different regimes, but without the root causes of closedness in education being addressed (Das, 2016). Issues such as differences between cities and provinces, quality of life, availability and access to technological equipment, civic culture and social stereotypes, or even the availability of electricity are not sufficiently addressed and, so, openness is superficial and constrained by political agendas (Ma & Chen, 2020;Olakulehin & Singh, 2013;Tynan & James, 2013). Therefore, openness in education is sometimes a tool in the hands of politicians and ends up failing, intensifying inequalities and creating an academic apartheid, confirming Bourdieu's and Bernstein's aforementioned theories of inequalities in both society and education.…”
Section: Factors Of Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that Central and Coastal Chinese cities, which were most exposed to the global markets, had the lowest level of SWB and vice versa. In another study in China, Ma and Chen (2020) got an inverse U-shaped relation between trade openness and happiness. Welsch and Kühling (2016) revealed that increased trade openness had enhanced SWB in 30 OECD countries during 1990-2009.…”
Section: Globalisation and Happinessmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the large urban centres (with variation in scale in both the eastern and western worlds), the cost of living close to the city centre and services centre has risen dramatically, so that either people can afford to spend a lot of money on the few remaining dwellings/accommodations (the city centre usually also becomes the financial centre with a majority of office buildings), or compromises have to be made on the distance to the city centre, on the cubage, on the quality of housing, on neighbourhoods, or the quality of life in general [61,[63][64][65][66][67][68]. -Suburban and small rural centres are depopulating, with the loss of value of buildings, and consequent lack of investment for maintenance, to ensure territorial continuity through transport, to guarantee changes for the prevention of natural disasters, or the simple right to health and work.…”
Section: Urban Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%