2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31753-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening Personalization to Partners: An Architecture of Participation for Websites

Abstract: Abstract. Open innovation and collaborative development are attracting considerable attention as new software construction models. Traditionally, website code is a "wall garden" hidden from partners. In the other extreme, you can move to open source where the entirety of the code is disclosed. A middle way is to expose just those parts where collaboration might report the highest benefits. Personalization can be one of those parts. Partners might be better positioned to foresee new ways to adapt/extend your we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…while such extensive privileges are hardly required. Different studies corroborate this [Barth et al 2010;Liverani and Freeman 2009]. Specifically, Barth et al [2010], after revising 25 popular Mozilla Firefox extensions, found that 88% of these extensions need less than the full set of available privileges.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…while such extensive privileges are hardly required. Different studies corroborate this [Barth et al 2010;Liverani and Freeman 2009]. Specifically, Barth et al [2010], after revising 25 popular Mozilla Firefox extensions, found that 88% of these extensions need less than the full set of available privileges.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…From the academy, in more recent years many works have investigated the potential of using End-User Programming techniques for allowing users to customize their applications [4] [9]. Participation of the crowd of end-users is often presented as a suitable alternative for personalization, which often requires appropriate tool support and methodological approach for personalization [6]. Indeed, many works such as [7] focus on tool support for allowing end-users to tune Web sites.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's Web 2.0 users wish to personalize their devices and applications -from minorly invasive customizations (such as changing the visual appearance) to functionality-extending changes that constitute true forms of extensibility. Not only smartphones, tablets, and browsers are in focus of personalization, but also existing RIAs should be customizable -and even extensible -in previously unforeseen directions [3,31,12,34,15,18,22,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%