Open Participatory Design and Digital Tools for Inclusive &amp; Resilient Development

Guzman, Santiago Sanchez; Giffinger, Rudolf; Parra-Agudelo, Leonardo; Bogadi, Antonija

doi:10.1145/3384772.3385164

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study shows that this pattern of development is not consistently recognizable. All studies based on non-mediated interaction of participants [10,11,35] were designed as traditional workshops operating by analogic means.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This approach plays an essential role in the design process because it can be scaled up [18]. Some authors consider the digitalization of community workshops to be an innovative approach that offers opportunities to foster the potential for inclusive design processes and consequently to increase the quality of life in the urban environment [10,[33][34][35]. However, collaboration across disciplines and different areas of expertise presents major challenges [34].…”

Section: Level Of Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the main challenges is to provide digital tools with the capacity to generate interactive 3D visualization allowing for realistic perception of the design process and empowering stakeholders with different skills to make informed arguments and decisions [12]. These tools aim to stimulate collective curator practices to democratize the decision-making process in contemporary urban planning at a neighborhood scale [35,39].…”

Section: Level Of Digitalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is notable that many published studies focus on the effect of technology on the co-design process, and how to involve different stakeholders through digitalization [16,20,21,35,40]. Such approaches, however, have failed to address certain issues regarding the interactivity of stakeholders with each other and with the design object during the co-design process.…”

Section: Level Of Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 11th sustainable development goal highlights the importance of making our cities more inclusive. For that, planning processes should become more engaging and empower citizens to actively participate in designing their environments. However, the COVID-19 crisis exposed inequalities and posed challenges to communal activities due to restrictions on face-to-face activities. These constraints brought many researchers and practitioners to rethink the process of co-designing workshops, putting digitalization in the spotlight. The present study consists of a systematic literature review focusing on understanding how digital technologies affect participatory approaches in urban design and how they have evolved since the 1990s. Also, it investigates the correlation between levels of participation and interaction in different types of collaborative design workshops held in communities. We found that many authors have been developing new methodologies and digital tools aiming to digitalize the co-designing experience through mediation. However, there is no evolutionary evidence of tools in the field creating bridges between digitalization, participation, and interaction. We argue that a research agenda is required to produce more sophisticated tools to tackle social barriers and support inclusive design towards sustainable urban development patterns.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Level Of Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Level Of Digitalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Level Of Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Poderi and Dittrich [66] identified 7 papers addressing environmental sustainability, and 11 papers addressing the sustainability of the results. To ground our work in an up to date review, we ran their query script in the last two editions of PDC resulting in 17 papers [2,12,15,20,25,37,38,41,43,64,66,68,71,74,81,92,93], highlighting an increasing interest toward this topic, in particular toward environmental sustainability.…”

Section: Sustainability and The Commonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Off-the-shelf digital tools as a resource to nurture the commons

Bettega

Masu

Hansen

et al. 2022

Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commons and commoning are of increasing interest to the PD community. We argue that off-the-shelf digital commons can be used in the context of PD to support groups in their commoning practices. This approach presents some advantages: it allows focusing resources on participation rather than software development and it fosters sustainability of results when researchers leave. But how do we understand whether an off-the-shelf tool can be considered a commons or not? Where do we find digital commons? How do we select them? In this paper, we will try to answer these questions by proposing theoretical considerations and practical criteria based on the reflexive account of a case study in Europe.

show abstract

Open Participatory Design and Digital Tools for Inclusive & Resilient Development

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

Off-the-shelf digital tools as a resource to nurture the commons

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About