2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open forest ecosystems: An excluded state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pine‐dominated (mostly P. rigida , P. resinosa , and P. pungens ) sites had an average MFI of 5.9 while mixed‐oak (mostly Q. alba , Q. montana , Q. velutina , and Q. rubra ) sites had a slightly longer MFI of 7.4 yr (based on studies presented in Lafon et al 2017). These frequent historical fire return interval estimates also coincide with evidence from historical stand data indicating that many eastern U.S. forests within the American chestnut range were once much more open (Hanberry and Nowacki 2016, Hanberry et al 2020 b ). Still, the absence of direct proof is not the proof of absence of fire in American chestnut forests.…”
Section: Evidence Of Fire In American Chestnut Forestssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pine‐dominated (mostly P. rigida , P. resinosa , and P. pungens ) sites had an average MFI of 5.9 while mixed‐oak (mostly Q. alba , Q. montana , Q. velutina , and Q. rubra ) sites had a slightly longer MFI of 7.4 yr (based on studies presented in Lafon et al 2017). These frequent historical fire return interval estimates also coincide with evidence from historical stand data indicating that many eastern U.S. forests within the American chestnut range were once much more open (Hanberry and Nowacki 2016, Hanberry et al 2020 b ). Still, the absence of direct proof is not the proof of absence of fire in American chestnut forests.…”
Section: Evidence Of Fire In American Chestnut Forestssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The absence of fire, along with other land management impacts, has resulted in substantial changes to eastern North American forest composition and structure over the last century (McEwan et al 2011, Hanberry et al 2020 b ). In many instances, the exclusion of fire has resulted in increased tree density and greater representation of more shade‐tolerant, mesic species.…”
Section: Implications On the Loss Of American Chestnut And Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to changes in forest structure documented across the eastern United States and Great Lakes Region, the loss of frequent surface fire has led to reduced regeneration opportunities for red pine, increased competition from fire‐intolerant species, and increased stand density over the past century (Hanberry et al. 2012, 2020, Young et al. 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other old growth and naturally less enduring, short-lived forests are filtered by different disturbance types and severity. Frequent surface fire is an understory disturbance that is critical for maintaining a bilayer of fire-tolerant trees and herbaceous vegetation in tropical and temperate savannas and woodlands, but because overstory disturbance is rare, these forests are also old growth with long-lived tree species [10]. In contrast, severe fire removes both understory and overstory trees every 50 to 150 years in boreal forests, favoring auto-replacement by the pre-fire tree species, which have traits for rapid post-fire recovery [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of disturbance and disturbance change may receive less consideration than the effects of climate and climate change; nonetheless, disturbance change has already caused widespread declines in historical forests. Currently, widespread overstory disturbance, with minimal understory disturbance, for forest products creates a cycle of short-term closed forests, which tend to be non-analogous in composition and structure compared to historical forests [10]. During Euro-American settlement and particularly between 1850 and 1920, the combination of increased population and improved tools of industrialization led to forest removal for different forest products and land uses, primarily agriculture, throughout the Eastern United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%