Open Data Policies Analysis Disputes Mediation Cases in Korea: Based on OUR Data Index and ODB

Seo, Jeongeun; Kim, Beopyeon; Kwon, Hun Yeong

doi:10.1145/3463677.3463735

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Primarily, public administrations have a tremendous amount of public data, which are sleeping and it has thus raised calls for open data among ICT-developed countries. Most representative examples are data.gov of USA and data.gov.uk of the UK, which are portal sites for public data [8]. Open data, which requires the same openness that enables transparency, also enables innovation, as developers build applications that reuse government data in unexpected ways [26,61].…”

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The position of data has changed from a passive role to an active role. IT-developed countries like the US and the UK have been focusing on how to open and use data to create more added value as the primary growth engine [8,77]. With these trends, data can be designated as playing a significant role in GaaP.…”

Section: Sub-factors Of Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The open government data platform's notion shows that the stakeholders access data from public agencies on the standard digital platform. Then they exploit the acquired data for various purposes [8]. Above all, the implementation of GaaP in the public sector is one of the critical factors to shift from e-government to a digital government approach in digital transformation, which pursues fundamental changes in diverse areas by using digital technologies [9,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Priority of Factors of Building Government as a Platform with Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis

Seo

Myeong

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the Government as a Platform (GaaP) based on cloud computing and network, has come to be considered a new structure to manage efficiently data-driven administration in the public sector. When the GaaP concept was first introduced, the ICT infrastructures that could underpin GaaP were not sufficiently developed. However, the recent digital transformation has transformed the previous electronic government, which was system- and architecture-oriented. As part of the next generation of government models, GaaP may reinvent the government at a lower cost but with better performance, similar to the case of electronic government two decades ago. This study attempted to determine the priority of factors of GaaP by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology. Because of the GaaP characteristics, we drew the main components for building GaaP from previous studies and a group interview with experts. The study results show that experts tend to prefer publicness in terms of building GaaP. Most of the factors that the experts weighed with the highest importance are related to the public sector, which revealed that governments should focus on their primary duty, regardless of the origin and characteristics of the platform in GaaP. However, since GaaP allows governments to be more horizontal and innovative, the platform approach can fundamentally shift the existing processes and culture of the public sector. The enhanced activity of citizens with ICT can also accelerate the introduction of GaaP. Finally, the study showed that a data-driven GaaP is necessary to efficiently handle big data, contract services, and multiple levels of on-line and off-line channels. In this public platform, government, citizens, and private sector organizations can work cooperatively as partners to seamlessly govern the hyper-connected society.

show abstract

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sub-factors Of Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Priority of Factors of Building Government as a Platform with Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis

Seo

Myeong

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During these developments, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) developed an OUR (open, useful, reusable) Data Index to determine and evaluate public data provision. Similarly, the international WWW Foundation created an Open Data Barometer, providing an overview of government data publication [9].…”

Section: Open Data Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, limitations are addressed in Section 7. The disclosure of government data, known as Open Governance Data (OGD), has become a significant global topic [9][10][11]. OGD is attributed to transformative value [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scoping Review on Analysis of the Barriers and Support Factors of Open Data

Lichtenauer,

Schmidbauer,

Wilhelm

et al. 2023

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Using personal data as Open Data is a pervasive topic globally, spanning various sectors and disciplines. Recent technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence and algorithm-driven analysis, have significantly expanded the capacity for the automated analysis of vast datasets. There’s an expectation that Open Data analysis can drive innovation, enhance services, and streamline administrative processes. However, this necessitates a legally and ethically sound framework alongside intelligent technical tools to comprehensively analyze data for societal benefit. Methodology: A systematic review across seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, BASE, LIVIVO, Web of Science, IEEExplore, and ACM) was conducted to assess the current research on barriers, support factors, and options for the anonymized processing of personal data as Open Data. Additionally, a supplementary search was performed in Google Scholar. A total of n=1192 studies were identified, and n=55 met the inclusion criteria through a multi-stage selection process for further analysis. Results: Fourteen potential supporting factors (n=14) and thirteen barriers (n=13) to the provision and anonymization of personal data were identified. These encompassed technical prerequisites as well as institutional, personnel, ethical, and legal considerations. These findings offer insights into existing obstacles and supportive structures within Open Data processes for effective implementation.

show abstract

Data Collaboration in Digital Government Research: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

Schmeling,

Al Dakruni,

Mergel

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Data Policies Analysis Disputes Mediation Cases in Korea: Based on OUR Data Index and ODB

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The Priority of Factors of Building Government as a Platform with Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis

The Priority of Factors of Building Government as a Platform with Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis

A Scoping Review on Analysis of the Barriers and Support Factors of Open Data

Data Collaboration in Digital Government Research: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About