2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open access publishers: The new players

Abstract: The essential role of journals as registries of scientific activity in all areas of knowledge justifies concern about their ownership and type of access. The purpose of this research is to analyze the main characteristics of publishers with journals that have received the DOAJ Seal. The specific objectives are a) to identify publishers and journals registered with the DOAJ Seal; b) to characterize those publishers; and c) to analyze their article processing fees. The research method involved the use of the DOA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, commercial publishers managed 16.2% of the journals used in Social Sciences and 7.3% of the journals used in Humanities, Literature & Arts. These results seem to confirm that commercial publishers have had, historically, a low economic interest on these type of journals as their number have been traditionally low since the print era (Rodrigues et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, commercial publishers managed 16.2% of the journals used in Social Sciences and 7.3% of the journals used in Humanities, Literature & Arts. These results seem to confirm that commercial publishers have had, historically, a low economic interest on these type of journals as their number have been traditionally low since the print era (Rodrigues et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In this study, commercial publishers managed 16.2% of the journals used in Social Sciences and 7.3% of the journals used in Humanities, Literature & Arts. These results seem to confirm that commercial publishers have had, historically, a low economic interest on these type of journals as their number have been traditionally low since the print era (Rodrigues et al, 2020). As Table 1 outlines, 60.5% of the money spent on APC during 2019 was directed towards the publication of 2443 documents (54.3%) in the areas of Health & Medical Sciences along with Life & Earth Sciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…found that market power is an important driver of APCs, through market concentration, publisher size and, in particular, the choice of hybrid publishing model. On market concentration among OA journals, see also SchwarzRodrigues et al (2020).10 WhileBjörk (2017) estimated that the number of hybrid OA journals increased from approximately 2,000 in 2009 to nearly 10,000 in 2016 and the number of hybrid articles increased from 8,000 to 45,000 over the same period,Pinowar et al (2018, table 3) found that among a sample of 100,000 articles published between 2009 and 2015 in hybrid journals and indexed in the Web of Science, only 4.3% were open access. See alsoSTM (2018, 107f.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El acceso abierto ha impactado en el sistema editorial tradicional, propiciando la aparición de nuevos actores en el sistema, los editores de acceso abierto (Rodrigues et al, 2020) también forzando a las editoriales tradicionales como Elsevier, Springer-Nature y Sage, a crear divisiones de acceso abierto y a migrar hacia un nuevo sistema de financiación basado en el pago de tasas por parte de los autores (APC, Article Processing Charges) en vez del pago de las suscripciones por parte de los lectores.…”
Section: Acceso Abiertounclassified