2014 International Conference on Cloud and Autonomic Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccac.2014.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-Driven Cyber-Security Threat Assessment Based on Sentiment Analysis of Network Activity Data

Abstract: Sentiment analysis is gaining acceptance as a tool for automated understanding of consumer attitudes and preferences. Based on well-designed rule sets that describe how most people express their sentiments, sentiment analysis models enable automated processes to understand human responses. In this paper, we describe our vision of extending sentiment analysis to the novel domain of cyber-security. Our proposal combines: 1) ontological modeling of attacks, defenses, and attacker goals; 2) sentiment analysis of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the analyzed investigations use machine learning to evaluate sentiment. Natural language processing techniques are explored in the approaches proposed in [52,58,60,[62][63][64]74,75]; data mining and semantic analysis are used in [51]. In general, the studies presented better assertiveness measures in the categorization of sentiment using complementary approaches (e.g., semantic descriptors with ML) as compared with a single one.…”
Section: Discussion On Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the analyzed investigations use machine learning to evaluate sentiment. Natural language processing techniques are explored in the approaches proposed in [52,58,60,[62][63][64]74,75]; data mining and semantic analysis are used in [51]. In general, the studies presented better assertiveness measures in the categorization of sentiment using complementary approaches (e.g., semantic descriptors with ML) as compared with a single one.…”
Section: Discussion On Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic was not present when using ontologies for semantic analysis of texts written in natural language. The use of NLP techniques used in conjunction with ontologies demonstrated good results in [74], reaching an accuracy of 86%.…”
Section: Discussion On Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c) Interoperability in result communication by multiple transport protocols and data formats using alerting mode and storage capabilities d) Interoperability in result visualization by integration with existing systems and dashboards. It allows the ability to build and deploy existing custom gadgets with existing dashboards and the ability of its integration with third-party visualization and reporting tools (Brohi et al, 2016;Lundquist et al, 2014).…”
Section: Data Visualizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, foram identificadas técnicas e aperfeiçoamentos na área de categorização de emoções e sentimentos que abordam intenções indiretamente. As propostas avaliadas fazem uso de técnicas de processamento de linguagem natural (Anzovino et al, 2018), (Appling et al, 2015), (Barreira et al, 2017), (Hagen et al, 2015), (Hu & Wang, 2016), (Justo et al, 2014), (Lundquist, Zhang, & Ouksel, 2015), (Maynard, Bontcheva, & Augenstein, 2016), mineração de dados e análise da semântica (García-Díaz et al, 2018). Neste sentido, 9 estudos (Anzovino et al, 2018), (Appling et al, 2015), (Barreira et al, 2017), (García-Díaz et al, 2018), (Hagen et al, 2015), (Hu & Wang, 2016), (Justo et al, 2014), (Lundquist et al, 2015), (Maynard et al, 2016) apresentaram melhores índices de assertividade na categorização de sentimentos.…”
Section: Discussão E Conclusãounclassified