2008
DOI: 10.1109/aswec.2008.4483247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies Integration for University Institutions: Approach to an Alignment Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process 2: Complementary knowledge was obtained by a comparison between the host-ontology (DEA) and another domain ontology located and recovered from the Internet (LUBM-ontology [64]). During the OL process, the DEA-ontology of an academic management subdomain was updated by users through ontologymatching methods (the Protégé-Prompt-CogZ tool [65]) [66]. Process 3: Important knowledge about the DEA domain was recovered and selected as a corpus of texts (480 files) from specialized journals related to this domain.…”
Section: Olekss Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process 2: Complementary knowledge was obtained by a comparison between the host-ontology (DEA) and another domain ontology located and recovered from the Internet (LUBM-ontology [64]). During the OL process, the DEA-ontology of an academic management subdomain was updated by users through ontologymatching methods (the Protégé-Prompt-CogZ tool [65]) [66]. Process 3: Important knowledge about the DEA domain was recovered and selected as a corpus of texts (480 files) from specialized journals related to this domain.…”
Section: Olekss Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%