2009
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies in knowledge management support: A case study

Abstract: Information and knowledge are true assets in modern organizations. In order to cope with the need to manage these assets, corporations have invested in a set of practices that are conventionally called knowledge management. This article presents a case study on the development and the evaluation of ontologies that was conducted within the scope of a knowledge management project undertaken by the second largest Brazilian energy utility. Ontologies have different applications and can be used in knowledge managem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we discuss the usage of the proposed characterization of documents to classify documents in ontologies. The use of ontologies for KM it is a well-founded topic (Almeida & Barbosa, 2009). The first topic to be discussed regards to the effects that certain kinds of documents can generate in another contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we discuss the usage of the proposed characterization of documents to classify documents in ontologies. The use of ontologies for KM it is a well-founded topic (Almeida & Barbosa, 2009). The first topic to be discussed regards to the effects that certain kinds of documents can generate in another contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the construction of an ontology can be a central element in understanding the codified knowledge in a domain. Ontologies may be constructed by working with domain experts (Rao et al 2009;Almeida and Barbosa 2009), or increasingly by automated means (Guo et al 2009). Gavrilova et al (2013) give a comprehensive review of how to develop ontologies.…”
Section: Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst various approaches to evaluating an ontology exist, "competency questions" remains the most common approach (Almeida & Barbosa, 2009;Uschold & Grüninger, 1996). This approach stipulates that an ontology must be able to represent the competency questions using its terminology and answer these questions using the axioms (Gruninger & Fox, 1994).…”
Section: Validation Of Amonmentioning
confidence: 99%